Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix frequency-dependent iterative CPHF #91

Open
wants to merge 11 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

berquist
Copy link
Contributor

A bug where the list holding response vectors (self.x) wasn't cleared was hiding the fact that solve_dynamic_iterative was not correct.

@codecov-io
Copy link

Codecov Report

Merging #91 into master will decrease coverage by <.01%.
The diff coverage is 100%.

# Build initial guess, previous vectors, and DIIS objects
norb = self.scf_wfn.nmo()
C = np.asarray(self.C)
rhsmats = [C.T @ np.asarray(dipmat) @ C for dipmat in self.tmp_dipoles]
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Could you use np.dot here. I do like the @ syntax better, just not sure if people are ready for it yet.

Copy link
Member

@dgasmith dgasmith left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I am not quite sure I follow this error, but everything looks good to me in general. Happy to merge once this comes out of draft.

@berquist berquist marked this pull request as ready for review November 11, 2022 04:55
@berquist
Copy link
Contributor Author

It is lost to the ages what the actual problem with the iterative solver was (something with separate response vectors rather than a single combined U?), but I had left this draft in the hopes of referencing another paper or two, but clearly that didn't happen. The code has been done the entire time.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants