Adhese: Switch to openrtb2 endpoint #3864

mefjush · 2024-08-16T13:59:09Z

Switch the Adhese adapter from /json to /openrtb2 endpoint. This is to keep our go adapter in line with with prebid-server-java Adhese adapter.

github-actions · 2024-08-16T13:59:43Z

adapters/adhese/adhese.go

-	if err != nil {
-		return nil, []error{err, WrapServerError(fmt.Sprintf("Could not parse Price %v as float ", string(adheseBid.Extension.Prebid.Cpm.Amount)))}
+func inferBidTypeFromImp(i openrtb2.Imp) (openrtb_ext.BidType, []error) {
+	if i.Banner != nil {


Consider this as a suggestion. The current implementation follows an anti-pattern, assumes that if there is a multi-format request, the media type defaults to openrtb_ext.BidTypeBanner, nil. Prebid server expects the media type to be explicitly set in the adapter response. Therefore, we strongly recommend implementing a pattern where the adapter server sets the MType field in the response to accurately determine the media type for the impression.

@mefjush any feedback on this

We've opened a PR where we document it as a limitation that multiple formats aren't supported.
https://github.com/prebid/prebid.github.io/pull/5618/files

adapters/adhese/adhese.go

github-actions · 2024-08-16T13:59:58Z

Code coverage summary

Note:

Prebid team doesn't anticipate tests covering code paths that might result in marshal and unmarshal errors
Coverage summary encompasses all commits leading up to the latest one, f031874

adhese

Refer here for heat map coverage report

github.com/prebid/prebid-server/v2/adapters/adhese/adhese.go:25:	makeSlot		100.0%
github.com/prebid/prebid-server/v2/adapters/adhese/adhese.go:29:	MakeRequests		85.7%
github.com/prebid/prebid-server/v2/adapters/adhese/adhese.go:106:	inferBidTypeFromImp	100.0%
github.com/prebid/prebid-server/v2/adapters/adhese/adhese.go:123:	MakeBids		72.7%
github.com/prebid/prebid-server/v2/adapters/adhese/adhese.go:199:	Builder			100.0%
total:									(statements)		82.9%

skonky · 2024-08-19T09:19:47Z

@SyntaxNode It got delayed a bit because of some internal testing with the new adapter, the techlead from Adhese has re-opened the PR.

Sorry for the late reply!

adapters/adhese/adhese.go

onkarvhanumante · 2024-08-22T10:51:26Z

static/bidder-info/adhese.yaml

@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-endpoint: "https://ads-{{.AccountID}}.adhese.com/json"
+endpoint: "https://ads-{{.AccountID}}.adhese.com/openrtb2"


@mefjush endpoint is not reachable

curl -i --location --request POST 'https://ads-1.adhese.com/openrtb2' curl: (60) SSL certificate problem: self signed certificate More details here: https://curl.se/docs/sslcerts.html curl failed to verify the legitimacy of the server and therefore could not establish a secure connection to it. To learn more about this situation and how to fix it, please visit the web page mentioned above.

This is related to the other concern you already shared. We require the users of the adapter to specify the AccountID so it matches their account name in Adhese. An example endpoint that could be reached is https://ads-demo.adhese.com/openrtb2 - that's coupled with demo account in our system.

Can we do any better to make this requirement more obvious to the user?

onkarvhanumante · 2024-08-22T10:52:22Z

openrtb_ext/imp_adhese.go

+	Account  string              `json:"account"`
+	Location string              `json:"location"`
+	Format   string              `json:"format"`
+	Targets  map[string][]string `json:"targets,omitempty"`


@mefjush should update bidder docs to add description for Targets ext param

The field is called data for pbjs, but it got renamed to targets in both the server-side adapters. I've added a column in the documentation where we specify the pbs ext name next to the pbjs configuration param name.
https://github.com/prebid/prebid.github.io/pull/5618/files

adapters/adhese/adhese.go

onkarvhanumante · 2024-08-22T10:59:33Z

adapters/adhese/adhese.go

+	if responseData.StatusCode == http.StatusNoContent {
+		return nil, nil
+	}

+	if responseData.StatusCode == http.StatusBadRequest {
+		err := &errortypes.BadInput{
+			Message: "Unexpected status code: 400. Bad request from publisher. Run with request.debug = 1 for more info.",
 		}
+		return nil, []error{err}
 	}
-	return bidderResponse, errs
-}

-func convertAdheseBid(adheseBid AdheseBid, adheseExt AdheseExt, adheseOriginData AdheseOriginData) openrtb2.BidResponse {
-	adheseExtJson, err := json.Marshal(adheseOriginData)
-	if err != nil {
-		adheseExtJson = make([]byte, 0)
+	if responseData.StatusCode != http.StatusOK {
+		err := &errortypes.BadServerResponse{
+			Message: fmt.Sprintf("Unexpected status code: %d. Run with request.debug = 1 for more info.", responseData.StatusCode),
+		}
+		return nil, []error{err}
 	}


could make use of response util here

prebid-server/adapters/response.go

Lines 1 to 28 in ec729e6

package adapters

import (

"fmt"

"net/http"

"github.com/prebid/prebid-server/v2/errortypes"

)

func CheckResponseStatusCodeForErrors(response *ResponseData) error {

if response.StatusCode == http.StatusBadRequest {

return &errortypes.BadInput{

Message: fmt.Sprintf("Unexpected status code: %d. Run with request.debug = 1 for more info", response.StatusCode),

}

}

if response.StatusCode != http.StatusOK {

return &errortypes.BadServerResponse{

Message: fmt.Sprintf("Unexpected status code: %d. Run with request.debug = 1 for more info", response.StatusCode),

}

}

return nil

}

func IsResponseStatusCodeNoContent(response *ResponseData) bool {

return response.StatusCode == http.StatusNoContent

}

onkarvhanumante · 2024-08-22T11:00:28Z

adapters/adhese/adhese.go

-}
+	// create a new bidResponse with a capacity of 1 because we only expect 1 bid
+	bidResponse := adapters.NewBidderResponseWithBidsCapacity(1)
+	bidResponse.Currency = response.Cur


adapters.NewBidderResponseWithBidsCapacity initialises bidResponse.Currency with USD value

consider scenario where bidResponse.Currency is empty, assigning response.Cur directly may set bidResponse.Currency to empty value

consider implementing following changes:

bidResponse := adapters.NewBidderResponseWithBidsCapacity(len(response.SeatBid[0].Bid)) if response.Cur != "" { bidResponse.Currency = response.Cur }

onkarvhanumante · 2024-08-22T11:01:41Z

static/bidder-info/adhese.yaml

@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-endpoint: "https://ads-{{.AccountID}}.adhese.com/json"
+endpoint: "https://ads-{{.AccountID}}.adhese.com/openrtb2"


consider that usage of partial dynamic urls is being discouraged and prebid team in future will be working to avoid usage of dynamic subdomain in endpoint url.
Major concerns with such usage are,

security concerns
The security aspect is alleviated by using a fixed top level domain. Due to the potential harm to hosts, we are strict in this requirement. We are working towards fixing the few adapters currently in violation.

connection performance
The connection performance advice is for your benefit. Client specific subdomains prevent Prebid Server from reusing connections across your clients which results in more connections needed for your adapter. The issue gets worse the more successful you are in attracting new clients. Hosts may choose to disable your adapter due to this behavior.

Can we address this concern separately from this PR?

Historically we've been always assigning individual domains to each tenant in out system, eg. ads-demo.adhese.com for demo account.

To change this approach we'd need to introduce a few architectural changes to our services. I'm happy to plan them in, but we'd rather move forward with the new adapter before the new endpoint approach is implemented.

github-actions · 2024-09-17T12:15:57Z

Code coverage summary

Note:

Prebid team doesn't anticipate tests covering code paths that might result in marshal and unmarshal errors
Coverage summary encompasses all commits leading up to the latest one, b2c13e2

adhese

Refer here for heat map coverage report

github.com/prebid/prebid-server/v2/adapters/adhese/adhese.go:24:	makeSlot		100.0%
github.com/prebid/prebid-server/v2/adapters/adhese/adhese.go:28:	MakeRequests		85.7%
github.com/prebid/prebid-server/v2/adapters/adhese/adhese.go:105:	inferBidTypeFromImp	100.0%
github.com/prebid/prebid-server/v2/adapters/adhese/adhese.go:122:	MakeBids		78.1%
github.com/prebid/prebid-server/v2/adapters/adhese/adhese.go:191:	Builder			100.0%
total:									(statements)		85.3%

github-actions · 2024-09-17T12:20:05Z

Code coverage summary

Note:

Prebid team doesn't anticipate tests covering code paths that might result in marshal and unmarshal errors
Coverage summary encompasses all commits leading up to the latest one, 0e97d54

adhese

Refer here for heat map coverage report

github.com/prebid/prebid-server/v2/adapters/adhese/adhese.go:24:	makeSlot		100.0%
github.com/prebid/prebid-server/v2/adapters/adhese/adhese.go:28:	MakeRequests		85.7%
github.com/prebid/prebid-server/v2/adapters/adhese/adhese.go:105:	inferBidTypeFromImp	100.0%
github.com/prebid/prebid-server/v2/adapters/adhese/adhese.go:122:	MakeBids		78.1%
github.com/prebid/prebid-server/v2/adapters/adhese/adhese.go:191:	Builder			100.0%
total:									(statements)		85.3%

* change endpoint * initial setup rewrite to POST endpoint * modify MakeBids and MakeRequests * change the name from Keywords to Targets so it matches json * tests --------- Co-authored-by: skonky <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: frank <[email protected]>

github-actions · 2024-09-17T12:32:28Z

Code coverage summary

Note:

Prebid team doesn't anticipate tests covering code paths that might result in marshal and unmarshal errors
Coverage summary encompasses all commits leading up to the latest one, 8f5225f

adhese

Refer here for heat map coverage report

github.com/prebid/prebid-server/v2/adapters/adhese/adhese.go:24:	makeSlot		100.0%
github.com/prebid/prebid-server/v2/adapters/adhese/adhese.go:28:	MakeRequests		85.7%
github.com/prebid/prebid-server/v2/adapters/adhese/adhese.go:105:	inferBidTypeFromImp	92.9%
github.com/prebid/prebid-server/v2/adapters/adhese/adhese.go:133:	MakeBids		78.1%
github.com/prebid/prebid-server/v2/adapters/adhese/adhese.go:202:	Builder			100.0%
total:									(statements)		85.0%

mefjush · 2024-09-24T17:00:45Z

Hi @onkarvhanumante I think we've addressed (or replied to) all the comments in the PR. Could we have another round of review please?

github-actions · 2024-11-18T10:09:26Z

Code coverage summary

Note:

Prebid team doesn't anticipate tests covering code paths that might result in marshal and unmarshal errors
Coverage summary encompasses all commits leading up to the latest one, ce3e470

adhese

Refer here for heat map coverage report

github.com/prebid/prebid-server/v3/adapters/adhese/adhese.go:24:	makeSlot		100.0%
github.com/prebid/prebid-server/v3/adapters/adhese/adhese.go:28:	MakeRequests		80.0%
github.com/prebid/prebid-server/v3/adapters/adhese/adhese.go:109:	inferBidTypeFromImp	92.9%
github.com/prebid/prebid-server/v3/adapters/adhese/adhese.go:137:	MakeBids		78.1%
github.com/prebid/prebid-server/v3/adapters/adhese/adhese.go:206:	Builder			100.0%
total:									(statements)		82.9%

github-actions · 2024-11-18T10:14:47Z

Code coverage summary

Note:

Prebid team doesn't anticipate tests covering code paths that might result in marshal and unmarshal errors
Coverage summary encompasses all commits leading up to the latest one, 53b2e98

adhese

Refer here for heat map coverage report

github.com/prebid/prebid-server/v3/adapters/adhese/adhese.go:24:	makeSlot		100.0%
github.com/prebid/prebid-server/v3/adapters/adhese/adhese.go:28:	MakeRequests		80.0%
github.com/prebid/prebid-server/v3/adapters/adhese/adhese.go:109:	inferBidTypeFromImp	92.9%
github.com/prebid/prebid-server/v3/adapters/adhese/adhese.go:137:	MakeBids		78.1%
github.com/prebid/prebid-server/v3/adapters/adhese/adhese.go:206:	Builder			100.0%
total:									(statements)		82.9%

github-actions · 2024-11-19T09:11:42Z

Code coverage summary

Note:

Prebid team doesn't anticipate tests covering code paths that might result in marshal and unmarshal errors
Coverage summary encompasses all commits leading up to the latest one, bc41b27

adhese

Refer here for heat map coverage report

github.com/prebid/prebid-server/v3/adapters/adhese/adhese.go:24:	makeSlot		100.0%
github.com/prebid/prebid-server/v3/adapters/adhese/adhese.go:28:	MakeRequests		80.0%
github.com/prebid/prebid-server/v3/adapters/adhese/adhese.go:109:	inferBidTypeFromImp	92.9%
github.com/prebid/prebid-server/v3/adapters/adhese/adhese.go:137:	MakeBids		78.1%
github.com/prebid/prebid-server/v3/adapters/adhese/adhese.go:206:	Builder			100.0%
total:									(statements)		82.9%

skonky · 2024-11-19T09:28:30Z

@SyntaxNode @bsardo Thanks alot for reviewing, I have implemented your suggestions and feedback. Is there anything else you want to be changed or are we OK to merge now :)?

adapters/adhese/adhese.go

hhhjort · 2024-11-21T22:06:10Z

Not for this PR, but so that you know. MakeRequests() returns a slice of requests. You can loop over the requests in the Imp[] and make one request per imp. PBS core will then send all those requests to your server. For each response it receives, it will call MakeBids() to get the bid from the response. It will then package all the bids together, allowing you to support multi Imp requests with very little work.

skonky · 2024-11-25T09:03:38Z

Not for this PR, but so that you know. MakeRequests() returns a slice of requests. You can loop over the requests in the Imp[] and make one request per imp. PBS core will then send all those requests to your server. For each response it receives, it will call MakeBids() to get the bid from the response. It will then package all the bids together, allowing you to support multi Imp requests with very little work.

@hhhjort
Yeah I would like to make a follow up PR for these improvements, our techlead @mefjush Is currently on leave but I will discuss this and the other points with him.

skonky · 2024-12-02T09:59:20Z

bump 👀

hhhjort

LGTM

skonky · 2024-12-06T11:46:04Z

What do you think @SyntaxNode @bsardo @onkarvhanumante @Sonali-More-Xandr

skonky · 2024-12-17T09:47:42Z

Think we can merge this before the EOY ?

bsardo · 2024-12-17T15:22:33Z

Think we can merge this before the EOY ?

I think so. @VeronikaSolovei9 is reviewing it.

VeronikaSolovei9 · 2024-12-17T18:12:50Z

adapters/adhese/adhese.go

-		if err := jsonutil.Unmarshal(request.User.Ext, &extUser); err == nil {
-			return "/xt" + extUser.Consent
-		}
+	if params.Account == "" || params.Location == "" {


Can you please double check? This if still present in the adapter code.
Also it doesn't match the properties setup in in adhere.json: "required": ["account", "location", "format"]

i have removed the check, it is indeed already handled by the adhese.json

@VeronikaSolovei9 Could you check again?

github-actions · 2024-12-17T18:37:53Z

Code coverage summary

Note:

Prebid team doesn't anticipate tests covering code paths that might result in marshal and unmarshal errors
Coverage summary encompasses all commits leading up to the latest one, 2442c2e

adhese

Refer here for heat map coverage report

github.com/prebid/prebid-server/v3/adapters/adhese/adhese.go:24:	makeSlot		100.0%
github.com/prebid/prebid-server/v3/adapters/adhese/adhese.go:28:	MakeRequests		82.1%
github.com/prebid/prebid-server/v3/adapters/adhese/adhese.go:103:	inferBidTypeFromImp	92.9%
github.com/prebid/prebid-server/v3/adapters/adhese/adhese.go:131:	MakeBids		78.1%
github.com/prebid/prebid-server/v3/adapters/adhese/adhese.go:200:	Builder			100.0%
total:									(statements)		83.8%

VeronikaSolovei9 · 2025-01-04T07:42:22Z

adapters/adhese/adhese.go

+	if len(request.Imp) == 0 {
+		return nil, []error{&errortypes.BadServerResponse{
+			Message: "No impression in the bid request",
+		}}
 	}


This is handled by PBS core, you don't need to check this. Request will never reach the adapter if there are no impressions.

VeronikaSolovei9 · 2025-01-04T07:43:47Z

adapters/adhese/adhese.go

-			Seat: "",
-		}},
+	// create a new bidResponse with a capacity of 1 because we only expect 1 bid
+	bidResponse := adapters.NewBidderResponseWithBidsCapacity(len(response.SeatBid[0].Bid))


When I run the request to Adhese I see a NPE in logs when response is empty and doesn't have any bids back. Please take a look at this expression: response.SeatBid[0].Bid.
It should follow after the check if bid response has any bids, you have it already starting line 158:

if len(bidResponse.SeatBid) == 0 { return nil, []error{&errortypes.BadServerResponse{ Message: "Empty SeatBid array", }} }

VeronikaSolovei9 · 2025-01-04T07:50:15Z

adapters/adhese/adhese.go

+	if len(imp.Ext) == 0 {
+		return nil, []error{&errortypes.BadInput{Message: "imp.Ext is empty"}}


This check is not needed, it is handled by PBS core

VeronikaSolovei9 · 2025-01-04T07:50:36Z

adapters/adhese/adhese.go

+	if len(bidderExt.Bidder) == 0 {
+		return nil, []error{&errortypes.BadInput{Message: "bidderExt.Bidder is empty"}}


This check is not needed as well, it is handled by PBS core

adapters/adhese/adhese.go

VeronikaSolovei9 · 2025-01-04T07:59:40Z

adapters/adhese/adhese.go

+		Method: "POST",
+		Uri:    endpoint,
+		Body:   requestJSON,
+		ImpIDs: openrtb_ext.GetImpIDs(request.Imp),


If you only take first imp you probably don't need all ids.

VeronikaSolovei9 · 2025-01-04T08:04:15Z

adapters/adhese/adhese.go

-		var extArray []AdheseExt
-		var originDataArray []AdheseOriginData


adapters/adhese/ directory still has utils.go file where this data structs are defined. I didn't see any usages for these structs in code. May you please delete utils.go file?

VeronikaSolovei9 · 2025-01-04T08:08:55Z

adapters/adhese/adhesetest/supplemental/req-invalid-empty-imp-ext.json

@@ -31,8 +31,8 @@
  "expectedBidResponses": [],
  "expectedMakeRequestsErrors": [
    {
-      "value": "Request could not be parsed as ExtImpAdhese due to: expect { or n, but found",


You don't need to test this. Please delete the check(if len(imp.Ext) == 0, I left the comment) , and this test case.

VeronikaSolovei9 · 2025-01-04T08:10:00Z

adapters/adhese/adhesetest/supplemental/req-invalid-no-imp-ext.json

      {
-        "value": "Request could not be parsed as ExtImpBidder due to: expect { or n, but found",


Please delete this test case as well

github-actions bot reviewed Aug 16, 2024

View reviewed changes

adapters/adhese/adhese.go Show resolved Hide resolved

github-actions bot reviewed Aug 16, 2024

View reviewed changes

adapters/adhese/adhese.go Show resolved Hide resolved

github-actions bot reviewed Aug 16, 2024

View reviewed changes

adapters/adhese/adhese.go Show resolved Hide resolved

gargcreation1992 assigned onkarvhanumante and Sonali-More-Xandr Aug 19, 2024

onkarvhanumante reviewed Aug 22, 2024

View reviewed changes

adapters/adhese/adhese.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved

onkarvhanumante reviewed Aug 22, 2024

View reviewed changes

adapters/adhese/adhese.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved

onkarvhanumante reviewed Aug 22, 2024

View reviewed changes

bsardo changed the title ~~Adhese: Switch the adapter to /openrtb2 endpoint~~ Adhese: Switch to /openrtb2 endpoint Sep 3, 2024

bsardo changed the title ~~Adhese: Switch to /openrtb2 endpoint~~ Adhese: Switch to openrtb2 endpoint Sep 3, 2024

mefjush and others added 7 commits September 17, 2024 14:31

Update the test requests to better match the prod

0993436

change scope of types to be local

81eeec0

make use of response util

b526fc5

check if currency on the response is defined

7d29bdb

fix test

5d7d4d5

explicitly set the type

8f5225f

skonky force-pushed the new_endpoint branch from 0e97d54 to 8f5225f Compare September 17, 2024 12:31

mefjush mentioned this pull request Sep 24, 2024

[Adhese] Document pbs ext parameters prebid/prebid.github.io#5618

Merged

8 tasks

fix: remove error for empty imp in adhese adapter

ce3e470

table driven test design

53b2e98

skonky added 2 commits November 19, 2024 10:06

added minlenght for required fields

e77f3e2

use fake url instead of real

bc41b27

bsardo assigned hhhjort and SyntaxNode and unassigned onkarvhanumante, Sonali-More-Xandr and hhhjort Nov 21, 2024

hhhjort reviewed Nov 21, 2024

View reviewed changes

adapters/adhese/adhese.go Show resolved Hide resolved

hhhjort previously approved these changes Dec 3, 2024

View reviewed changes

bsardo assigned VeronikaSolovei9 and unassigned SyntaxNode Dec 16, 2024

VeronikaSolovei9 reviewed Dec 17, 2024

View reviewed changes

remove redundant check

2442c2e

skonky dismissed hhhjort’s stale review via 2442c2e December 17, 2024 18:37

hhhjort approved these changes Dec 18, 2024

View reviewed changes

VeronikaSolovei9 reviewed Jan 4, 2025

View reviewed changes

		@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
		endpoint: "https://ads-{{.AccountID}}.adhese.com/json"
		endpoint: "https://ads-{{.AccountID}}.adhese.com/openrtb2"

	package adapters

	import (
	"fmt"
	"net/http"

	"github.com/prebid/prebid-server/v2/errortypes"
	)

	func CheckResponseStatusCodeForErrors(response *ResponseData) error {
	if response.StatusCode == http.StatusBadRequest {
	return &errortypes.BadInput{
	Message: fmt.Sprintf("Unexpected status code: %d. Run with request.debug = 1 for more info", response.StatusCode),
	}
	}

	if response.StatusCode != http.StatusOK {
	return &errortypes.BadServerResponse{
	Message: fmt.Sprintf("Unexpected status code: %d. Run with request.debug = 1 for more info", response.StatusCode),
	}
	}

	return nil
	}

	func IsResponseStatusCodeNoContent(response *ResponseData) bool {
	return response.StatusCode == http.StatusNoContent
	}

		if len(imp.Ext) == 0 {
		return nil, []error{&errortypes.BadInput{Message: "imp.Ext is empty"}}

		if len(bidderExt.Bidder) == 0 {
		return nil, []error{&errortypes.BadInput{Message: "bidderExt.Bidder is empty"}}

		var extArray []AdheseExt
		var originDataArray []AdheseOriginData

		{
		"value": "Request could not be parsed as ExtImpBidder due to: expect { or n, but found",

Adhese: Switch to openrtb2 endpoint #3864

Are you sure you want to change the base?

Adhese: Switch to openrtb2 endpoint #3864

Conversation

mefjush commented Aug 16, 2024

github-actions bot Aug 16, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

github-actions bot commented Aug 16, 2024

Code coverage summary

adhese

skonky commented Aug 19, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

mefjush Sep 3, 2024 • edited Loading

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

github-actions bot commented Sep 17, 2024

Code coverage summary

adhese

github-actions bot commented Sep 17, 2024

Code coverage summary

adhese

github-actions bot commented Sep 17, 2024

Code coverage summary

adhese

mefjush commented Sep 24, 2024

github-actions bot commented Nov 18, 2024

Code coverage summary

adhese

github-actions bot commented Nov 18, 2024

Code coverage summary

adhese

github-actions bot commented Nov 19, 2024

Code coverage summary

adhese

skonky commented Nov 19, 2024

hhhjort commented Nov 21, 2024

skonky commented Nov 25, 2024 • edited Loading

skonky commented Dec 2, 2024

hhhjort left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

skonky commented Dec 6, 2024

skonky commented Dec 17, 2024

bsardo commented Dec 17, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

github-actions bot commented Dec 17, 2024

Code coverage summary

adhese

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

mefjush Sep 3, 2024 •

edited

Loading

skonky commented Nov 25, 2024 •

edited

Loading