-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 25
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
#8759: always show mod variable data panel in the Page Editor #8760
Conversation
Playwright test resultsDetails Open report ↗︎ Flaky testsedge › tests/extensionConsole/activation.spec.ts › can activate a mod with built-in integration Skipped testschrome › tests/runtime/googleSheetsIntegration.spec.ts › can activate a google spreadsheet mod with config options |
@@ -69,7 +69,7 @@ const internalFormStateFactory = define<InternalFormStateOverride>({ | |||
apiVersion: "v3" as ApiVersion, | |||
uuid: uuidSequence, | |||
installed: true, | |||
optionsArgs: {} as OptionsArgs, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Fix cooky-cutter warning about object re-use
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #8760 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 74.24% 74.24% -0.01%
==========================================
Files 1332 1332
Lines 40817 40820 +3
Branches 7634 7631 -3
==========================================
Hits 30306 30306
- Misses 10511 10514 +3 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
@@ -159,7 +159,7 @@ const EditTab: React.FC<{ | |||
<div className={styles.dataPanelWrapper}> | |||
<div className={styles.dataPanel}> | |||
{activeNodeId === FOUNDATION_NODE_ID ? ( | |||
<FoundationDataPanel /> | |||
<StarterBrickDataPanel /> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Renamed to use current terminology
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Should we also rename FOUNDATION_NODE_ID
?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I hadn't renamed in this PR because there's some other uses of foundation in reference to the foundation node type as well. I think we should do as a separate PR
No loom links were found in the first post. Please add one there if you'd like to it to appear on Slack. Do not edit this comment manually. |
What does this PR do?
Coordination
Checklist
Leave all that are relevant and check off as completed
For more information on our expectations for the PR process, see the
code review principles doc