#8609 Rename nodePreviewElement -> builderPreviewElement

[mnholtz]

What does this PR do?

• Closes Rename element -> documentPreviewComponent #8609
• Also reverts naming choice of activeDocumentOrFormPreviewElement -> activeBuilderPreviewElement

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 82.75862% with 5 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 73.71%. Comparing base (c32e86f) to head (6833242).
Report is 61 commits behind head on main.

Files	Patch %	Lines
...tabs/editTab/editorNodeLayout/usePipelineNodes.tsx	62.50%	3 Missing ⚠️
...or/documentBuilder/hooks/useSelectParentElement.ts	0.00%	1 Missing ⚠️
...or/tabs/editTab/editorNodes/PipelineHeaderNode.tsx	75.00%	1 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #8718      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   73.69%   73.71%   +0.01%     
==========================================
  Files        1344     1349       +5     
  Lines       41566    41735     +169     
  Branches     7775     7819      +44     
==========================================
+ Hits        30633    30764     +131     
- Misses      10933    10971      +38     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[mnholtz]

Realized that I accidentally made this branch off #8712, review that PR first so this diff can be fixed

[github-actions]

Playwright test results

 80 passed
 2 skipped

Details

 Open report ↗︎
 82 tests across 29 suites
 11 minutes, 12 seconds
 6833242

Skipped tests

chrome › tests/runtime/googleSheetsIntegration.spec.ts › can activate a google spreadsheet mod with config options
edge › tests/runtime/googleSheetsIntegration.spec.ts › can activate a google spreadsheet mod with config options

[github-actions]

No loom links were found in the first post. Please add one there if you'd like to it to appear on Slack.

Do not edit this comment manually.

[mnholtz]

Adding "do not merge" while awaiting base branch review to prevent the diff on that PR from blowing up

[twschiller]

Realized that I accidentally made this branch off #8712, review that PR first so this diff can be fixed

@mnholtz I merged that PR. Looks like you'll need to rebase this PR and fix any conflict that exist post-rebase

[twschiller]

@grahamlangford @mnholtz can we merge this to avoid potential merge conflicts down the road?