Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

SampleBuilder: Add Flush method #2683

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 28, 2024
Merged

Conversation

at-wat
Copy link
Member

@at-wat at-wat commented Feb 28, 2024

Flush marks all valid samples in the buffer to be popped. Useful for graceful shutdown without losing buffered data as much as possible.

Flush marks all valid samples in the buffer to be popped.
Useful for graceful shutdown without losing buffered data
as much as possible.
@at-wat at-wat self-assigned this Feb 28, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 28, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 76.44%. Comparing base (fa1f5d9) to head (e2988cf).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #2683      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   76.42%   76.44%   +0.01%     
==========================================
  Files          87       87              
  Lines        9926     9928       +2     
==========================================
+ Hits         7586     7589       +3     
  Misses       1869     1869              
+ Partials      471      470       -1     
Flag Coverage Δ
go 77.97% <100.00%> (+0.01%) ⬆️
wasm 64.60% <100.00%> (+0.01%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@edaniels edaniels merged commit 09a4f60 into master Feb 28, 2024
17 checks passed
@edaniels edaniels deleted the samplebuilder/add-flush-method branch February 28, 2024 15:32
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants