Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support Unknown Parameters in INIT Chunk #298

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 9, 2024
Merged

Support Unknown Parameters in INIT Chunk #298

merged 1 commit into from
Feb 9, 2024

Conversation

Sean-Der
Copy link
Member

@Sean-Der Sean-Der commented Feb 8, 2024

Start to implement section-3.2.1 and respect chunks with a action of Skip. We don't properly report the values back yet.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 8, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: 11 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Comparison is base (3a6b5ef) 80.48% compared to head (57ed47e) 67.30%.

Files Patch % Lines
chunk_init.go 0.00% 9 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
chunk_init_common.go 88.88% 0 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #298       +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage   80.48%   67.30%   -13.18%     
===========================================
  Files          48       48               
  Lines        4053     4056        +3     
===========================================
- Hits         3262     2730      -532     
- Misses        648     1172      +524     
- Partials      143      154       +11     
Flag Coverage Δ
go ?
wasm 67.30% <45.00%> (+0.12%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@Sean-Der
Copy link
Member Author

Sean-Der commented Feb 8, 2024

If someone has the availability mind looking at this? Soon Chrome is going to roll out with this new param (that we don't support yet)

Pion is going to fail to negotiate SCTP then. I want to get this out so we don't see DataChannels failing.

@Sean-Der
Copy link
Member Author

Sean-Der commented Feb 8, 2024

Test failure is ok/expected. We are breaking public API by not having unmarshal errors anymore

Copy link
Member

@edaniels edaniels left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM. Might be helpful to comment on report actions that we don't actually do that and/or point to a gh issue

chunk_init_common.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Start to implement section-3.2.1 and respect chunks with a action
of Skip. We don't properly report the values back yet.

Relates to #2618
@Sean-Der Sean-Der merged commit 2927025 into master Feb 9, 2024
10 of 14 checks passed
@Sean-Der Sean-Der deleted the skip-param branch February 9, 2024 00:53
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants