Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

0046 assign datetime #52

Merged
merged 87 commits into from
May 16, 2024
Merged

0046 assign datetime #52

merged 87 commits into from
May 16, 2024

Conversation

ramiromagno
Copy link
Collaborator

Thank you for your Pull Request! We have developed this task checklist from the
Development Process
Guide

to help with the final steps of the process. Completing the below tasks helps to
ensure our reviewers can maximize their time on your code as well as making sure
the oak codebase remains robust and consistent.

Please check off each taskbox as an acknowledgment that you completed the task
or check off that it is not relevant to your Pull Request. This checklist is
part of the Github Action workflows and the Pull Request will not be merged into
the devel branch until you have checked off each task.

  • [x ] Place Closes #<insert_issue_number> into the beginning of your Pull z
    Request Title (Use Edit button in top-right if you need to update)
  • [ x] Code is formatted according to the
    tidyverse style guide. Run
    styler::style_file() to style R and Rmd files
  • [x ] Updated relevant unit tests or have written new unit tests, which should
    consider realistic data scenarios and edge cases, e.g. empty datasets, errors,
    boundary cases etc. - See
    Unit Test Guide
  • [x ] If you removed/replaced any function and/or function parameters, did you
    fully follow the
    deprecation guidance?
  • [x ] Update to all relevant roxygen headers and examples, including keywords
    and families. Refer to the
    categorization of functions to tag appropriate keyword/family.
  • [x ] Run devtools::document() so all .Rd files in the man folder and the
    NAMESPACE file in the project root are updated appropriately
  • [ x] Address any updates needed for vignettes and/or templates
  • [x ] Update NEWS.md if the changes pertain to a user-facing function (i.e. it
    has an @export tag) or documentation aimed at users (rather than developers)
  • [ x] Build oak site pkgdown::build_site() and check that all affected
    examples are displayed correctly and that all new functions occur on the "Reference" page.
  • [x ] Address or fix all lintr warnings and errors - lintr::lint_package()
  • [x ] Run R CMD check locally and address all errors and warnings - devtools::check()
  • [x ] Link the issue in the Development Section on the right hand side.
  • [ x] Address all merge conflicts and resolve appropriately
  • [x ] Pat yourself on the back for a job well done! Much love to your accomplishment!

ramiromagno and others added 30 commits February 8, 2024 02:22
Update `hardcode_no_ct()` by allowing the rewriting of the `target_sdtm_variable` variable to preserve `NA`
* hardcode_no_ct algorithm code changes

* harcode_ct working as expected

* assign_ct and assign_no_ct works great.

* address review comments
Merge branch 'main' into 0040_hardcode_no_ct

# Conflicts:
#	DESCRIPTION
#	NAMESPACE
#	inst/WORDLIST
- Adds three new user facing ct-related functions: `read_ct_example()`, `ct_example()` and `read_ct()`
- Provides a ct example file in inst/ct/
As it is no longer needed.
Export `ct_vars()` such that we can cross-reference it from other functions' documentation.
@ramiromagno
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Hi @edgar-manukyan and @rammprasad: I noticed a few typos still lingering... So I decided to go and fix them.

@ramiromagno ramiromagno self-assigned this May 14, 2024
@ramiromagno ramiromagno requested review from edgar-manukyan and rammprasad and removed request for edgar-manukyan May 14, 2024 23:27
Copy link

Code Coverage

Package Line Rate Health
sdtm.oak 72%
Summary 72% (498 / 692)

@ramiromagno ramiromagno merged commit f9816fb into main May 16, 2024
13 checks passed
@ramiromagno ramiromagno deleted the 0046_assign_datetime branch May 16, 2024 17:48
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants