-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
MNT: add EntryVisitor and refactor search methods to use SearchVisitor #110
Draft
shilorigins
wants to merge
6
commits into
pcdshub:master
Choose a base branch
from
shilorigins:devagr/entry-visitor
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Draft
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
6 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
409bd78
ENH: add EntryVisitor class and implement Entry.accept methods
shilorigins df8077c
ENH: implement SearchVisitor (duplicate code in _Backend / FilestoreB…
shilorigins 7dc53c2
ENH: use SearchVisitor in existing backend.search methods
shilorigins 674df1e
TST: search by ancestor test case
shilorigins c29cfa1
MNT: rename Root.meta_id to Root.uuid for consistency with Entry
shilorigins 5ea3337
ENH: add 'ancestor' SearchTerm option to SearchVisitor
shilorigins File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@ | ||
from typing import Container, NamedTuple, Union | ||
|
||
from superscore.type_hints import AnyEpicsType | ||
|
||
SearchTermValue = Union[AnyEpicsType, Container[AnyEpicsType], tuple[AnyEpicsType, ...]] | ||
SearchTermType = tuple[str, str, SearchTermValue] | ||
|
||
|
||
class SearchTerm(NamedTuple): | ||
attr: str | ||
operator: str | ||
value: SearchTermValue |
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm seeing this elsewhere as starting with an "accept" call, such as
root.acept(visitor)
. These are functionally equivalent right?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
You're right, looks like I made up
.visit
without realizing. It does give us a benefit though: we can use.visit
for tracking state during traversal. For example,SearchVisitor
adds theEntry
to the path and pops it off the path in.visit
because.visit
doesn't return until all of the reachable entries have been traversed, whereas.visit*
return before the reachable entries are traversed. Without.visit
, we might have to move the traversal logic into.visit*
, so we can track the state we need.I'll try out removing
.visit
and seeing what changes need to be made.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
For reference, a sequence diagram and class diagram from the source of all my knowledge: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Visitor_pattern#Structure