Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Veto IM1K3 when MR1K3 is OUT #126

Open
wants to merge 4 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

KaushikMalapati
Copy link

@KaushikMalapati KaushikMalapati commented Nov 23, 2024

Description

Motivation and Context

https://jira.slac.stanford.edu/browse/ECS-6866

How Has This Been Tested?

Where Has This Been Documented?

Screenshots (if appropriate):

Pre-merge checklist

  • Code works interactively
  • Code contains descriptive comments
  • Test suite passes locally
  • Libraries are set to fixed versions and not Always Newest
  • Code committed with pre-commit (alternatively pre-commit run --all-files)

@KaushikMalapati KaushikMalapati marked this pull request as draft November 23, 2024 06:22
@@ -23,6 +23,10 @@ VAR
bMoveOk := TRUE,
bValid := TRUE
);

fbFakeFastFaultOutput: FB_HardwareFFOutput := (i_xVeto:=True);
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

we shouldn't use a fake arbiter.
we should use veto arbiter with the correct veto.
https://confluence.slac.stanford.edu/display/L2SI/PMPS+Veto+Tutorial

@KaushikMalapati KaushikMalapati changed the title Using fake arbiter/ffo for IM1K3 when MR1K3 is IN Using new arbiter/ffo for IM1K3 when MR1K3 is IN Nov 26, 2024
@KaushikMalapati KaushikMalapati marked this pull request as ready for review November 27, 2024 18:37
@KaushikMalapati KaushikMalapati changed the title Using new arbiter/ffo for IM1K3 when MR1K3 is IN Veto IM1K3 when MR1K3 is OUT Dec 3, 2024
@KaushikMalapati
Copy link
Author

@ghalym could you please re-review this? I tried adding a veto arbiter and virtual fast fault like in the page you linked.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants