Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bug Report: ClassLoader leak when Timer Service is used #7078

Closed
lprimak opened this issue Nov 21, 2024 · 3 comments · May be fixed by #7032
Closed

Bug Report: ClassLoader leak when Timer Service is used #7078

lprimak opened this issue Nov 21, 2024 · 3 comments · May be fixed by #7032
Assignees
Labels
Status: Accepted Confirmed defect or accepted improvement to implement, issue has been escalated to Platform Dev Type: Bug Label issue as a bug defect

Comments

@lprimak
Copy link
Contributor

lprimak commented Nov 21, 2024

Brief Summary

I have noticed that any application that uses @Scheduled or programmatic equivalents,
basically any application that touches TimerService doesn't unload properly, caused by ClassLoader leak

Expected Outcome

Application undeploys cleanly

Current Outcome

Leaks are detected

Reproducer

Not yet.

Operating System

Any

JDK Version

Any

Payara Distribution

Payara Server Full Profile, Payara Server Web Profile, Payara Micro, Payara Embedded All, Payara Embedded Web, Payara Docker Image

@lprimak lprimak added Status: Open Issue has been triaged by the front-line engineers and is being worked on verification Type: Bug Label issue as a bug defect labels Nov 21, 2024
@lprimak
Copy link
Contributor Author

lprimak commented Nov 21, 2024

I will see if I can provide a PR for this

@felixif
Copy link

felixif commented Nov 26, 2024

Hello @lprimak,

Thank you for reporting this issue. As there is no reproducer, I will wait for the PR to be made and afterwards I will close this issue, as the issue will be tracked via the PR itself.

Thank you again for contributing to the source code!

Have a great day,
Felix Ifrim

@felixif
Copy link

felixif commented Nov 26, 2024

Hello @lprimak,

I see that the PR made for #7031 contains the fix for this issue as well. So, if the fix is there, I will mark this issue as accepted, close it, and continue the discussion about both bug fixes on the PR itself.

Thank you,
Felix

@felixif felixif closed this as completed Nov 26, 2024
@felixif felixif added Status: Accepted Confirmed defect or accepted improvement to implement, issue has been escalated to Platform Dev and removed Status: Open Issue has been triaged by the front-line engineers and is being worked on verification labels Nov 26, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Status: Accepted Confirmed defect or accepted improvement to implement, issue has been escalated to Platform Dev Type: Bug Label issue as a bug defect
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants