-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 18.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
BUG: conversion a JSON field descriptor into pandas type for deprecated offsets frequency 'M' #55581
Merged
MarcoGorelli
merged 7 commits into
pandas-dev:main
from
natmokval:bug-read-json-table-period-for-depr-freq-M
Oct 24, 2023
Merged
BUG: conversion a JSON field descriptor into pandas type for deprecated offsets frequency 'M' #55581
Changes from 4 commits
Commits
Show all changes
7 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
a832dcc
correct convert_json_field_to_pandas_type
natmokval e55001e
fix pre-commit errors
natmokval e454892
correct def convert_json_field_to_pandas_type in case freq_n>1
natmokval c0a7ee6
remove print
natmokval 7a98c81
add parameterization to the test
natmokval e073336
replace the regex with to_offset
natmokval a298a24
Merge branch 'main' into bug-read-json-table-period-for-depr-freq-M
natmokval File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -845,3 +845,13 @@ def test_read_json_orient_table_old_schema_version(self): | |
expected = DataFrame({"a": [1, 2.0, "s"]}) | ||
result = pd.read_json(StringIO(df_json), orient="table") | ||
tm.assert_frame_equal(expected, result) | ||
|
||
def test_read_json_table_orient_period_depr_freq(self, recwarn): | ||
# GH#9586 | ||
df = DataFrame( | ||
{"ints": [1, 2]}, | ||
index=pd.PeriodIndex(["2011-01", "2011-08"], freq="2M"), | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. could we check it works for both There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. yeah, sure, I added parameterization to the test, for |
||
) | ||
out = df.to_json(orient="table") | ||
result = pd.read_json(out, orient="table") | ||
tm.assert_frame_equal(df, result) |
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
having a regular expression here looks a bit complex - would it work to do
instead?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
thank you, it works very well. I replaced the regular expression with to_offset and updated my PR.