-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 157
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix: preview app image navigation on shared with me page #11893
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@ | ||
Bugfix: Preview app Shared with me page | ||
|
||
We fixed a navigation issue with the preview app on the Shared with me page. | ||
|
||
https://github.com/owncloud/web/issues/11883 | ||
https://github.com/owncloud/web/pull/11893 |
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
As described, this is a bit of a hacky solution. My original idea was to check the presence of a current folder. If none is given, we can assume that the user is on some page where there is no actual space (Shared with me page, search results, etc). In that case we basically want the same logic as the respective folder loader for this page. However, the folder loader currently lives in the files app... Would it maybe make sense to register folder loaders via extension? @dschmidt What do you think?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The idea of the folder loaders was definitely to make them reusable from app contexts, but I'm not sure they really fit our concept of extensions.
At least I currently don't see a use case for third party folder loaders...
Can't we just move the folder loaders to web-pkg and use them here?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We had a quick chat: for the upcoming release we want this quick fix in, as it's easy to backport to the stable branch.
In the long run we think it's best to move the folder loaders to web-pkg.
Making them extensions would be nice for consistency reasons and we can come up with theoretic use cases for that (i.e. when apps register new routes/views which should be reloadable ... but it seems a bit artificial at this point and we suggest to avoid the effort until it's actually needed)