Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Enhancing Accuracy of LLM Integration #519

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Jan 26, 2025
Merged

Conversation

ksg97031
Copy link
Member

@ksg97031 ksg97031 commented Jan 25, 2025

@hahwul
I found the detailed format option!
Could you please review this PR?

Also, I have an idea:
How about changing the file filtering logic from using LLM to a standard search that looks for matching keywords (such as "endpoint," "url," "router," "controller," etc.) in the file?

저도 나가봐야해서 천천히 봐주십쇼!

@github-actions github-actions bot added 🔬 analyzer Issue for Analyzer 🤖 llm labels Jan 25, 2025
@ksg97031 ksg97031 linked an issue Jan 25, 2025 that may be closed by this pull request
@ksg97031 ksg97031 requested a review from hahwul January 25, 2025 07:49
@ksg97031 ksg97031 self-assigned this Jan 25, 2025
@hahwul
Copy link
Member

hahwul commented Jan 25, 2025

@ksg97031
Oh, that's a really good idea! I think that's a much more efficient way.

연휴 잘 보내세요 😊

@hahwul hahwul added this to the v0.19.1 milestone Jan 25, 2025
@ksg97031 ksg97031 merged commit a46f732 into main Jan 26, 2025
7 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
🔬 analyzer Issue for Analyzer 🤖 llm
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Unhandled exception (JSON::ParseException) in AI Integration
2 participants