Eagleye Test and Comparing Other Localization Sources #3830
meliketanrikulu
started this conversation in
Show and tell
Replies: 0 comments
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
This report includes the comparison results of pose estimation modules of Autoware Ndt-Ekf and ClapB7 GNSSINS Receiver EKF output and Eagleye.
Our test car has includes these sensors:
You can see here our test robot :
We are using concatenated point cloud for NDT and we also feed velocity to EKF for Autoware standart pipeline. Here linear velocity source is our vehicle odometry and angular velocity is comes from imu data.
In this test scenario, the standard Autoware EKF output (only NDT and velocity input are given), the EKF output produced by the GNSSINS sensor(CLAPB7) used, the raw GNSS data and the positions obtained in the eagleye output (comes from /eagleye/fix topic) are compared.
At some point during the test, the RTK connection was disconnected and the responses of the eagle and the sensor EKF(CLAPB7 GNSSINS) were monitored in a scenario where GNSS errors were high.
During the tests, the standard Autoware EKF output fed by NDT was also used as the base localization result. The position values of both localization sources (CLAPB7 GNSSINS EKF results and eagleye output) were compared with these position values. Position differences were monitored using plotjuggler.
Note: Local Cartesian UTM projection method was used for the map and incoming position values.
Tests
On the Rviz screen:
Results
Conclusion:
For reproduce the test:
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions