Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update online status threshold to 5 minutes from 30 seconds #718

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 20, 2024

Conversation

skanderm
Copy link
Contributor

@skanderm skanderm commented Nov 19, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Extended the time window for determining "online" feed segments from 30 seconds to 5 minutes, improving the accuracy of online status detection.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 19, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes in this pull request involve a modification to the exists aggregate in the Orcasite.Radio.Feed module. The filter condition for determining online feed segments has been adjusted from a threshold of 30 seconds to 5 minutes based on the inserted_at timestamp. This adjustment extends the timeframe for what is classified as "online," but no other changes to logic, error handling, or control flow have been implemented.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
server/lib/orcasite/radio/feed.ex Modified exists aggregate to change the filter from 30 seconds to 5 minutes for inserted_at.

Poem

In the meadow where the feeds do play,
A change was made to mark the day.
From thirty seconds, we now extend,
To five full minutes, our online friend!
Hop along, let the good times roll,
For every segment now has a longer stroll! 🐇✨

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@skanderm has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 16 minutes and 53 seconds before requesting another review.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between e34f566 and fec1013.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@paulcretu paulcretu temporarily deployed to orcasite-pr-718 November 19, 2024 23:13 Inactive
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
server/lib/orcasite/radio/feed.ex (1)

79-79: Consider the UX implications of the increased threshold.

The change from 30 seconds to 5 minutes will make the online status more stable but less responsive. While this reduces status flapping, it also means users won't be notified of feed disconnections for up to 5 minutes.

Consider adding:

  1. A visual indicator showing the last successful update time
  2. A "degraded" state for feeds that haven't updated in 1-5 minutes
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between e34f566 and fec1013.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • server/lib/orcasite/radio/feed.ex (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
server/lib/orcasite/radio/feed.ex (1)

79-79: Verify the impact on feed monitoring.

Let's verify if this change affects any monitoring or alerting systems that might depend on the online status.

✅ Verification successful

No impact on feed monitoring - change is part of the core online status calculation

The change to filter expr(inserted_at > ago(5, :minute)) is part of the core online status calculation in the Feed resource's aggregate definition. This is the primary mechanism for determining feed online status, and the 5-minute window is an intentional part of the design. The codebase shows:

  • The online status is exposed through an aggregate in Feed resource
  • No external monitoring systems depend on this calculation
  • The status is used directly by GraphQL through AshGraphql integration
  • No alerting systems are tied to this status check

The change is safe and maintains the intended functionality of the feed online status mechanism.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for monitoring or alerting code that might depend on feed online status
rg -A 5 "feed.*online|online.*feed" --type elixir

# Look for GraphQL queries that might be polling this status
ast-grep --pattern 'query {
  $$$
  online
  $$$
}'

# Check for potential WebSocket subscriptions
rg -A 5 "subscribe.*feed|feed.*subscribe" --type elixir

Length of output: 488


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's check for any GraphQL schema definitions or resolvers related to feed online status
rg -A 5 "field :online|:feed.*online" --type elixir

# Check for any tests that might verify the online status behavior
rg -A 5 "test.*online.*feed|feed.*online.*test" --type elixir

# Look for any Absinthe schema definitions related to feeds
ast-grep --pattern 'object :$_ do
  $$$
  field :online
  $$$
end'

# Check for any feed-related subscriptions in the schema
rg -A 5 "subscription do|subscribe" server/lib/orcasite_web/schema

Length of output: 326


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's find the schema file location first
fd schema.ex

# Check for any feed-related code in GraphQL types or schemas
rg -A 5 "type.*Feed|object.*:feed" --type elixir

# Look for any code that consumes the feed online status
rg -A 5 "feed\.online" --type elixir

# Check for any feed-related tests
fd test --type f | grep -i feed | xargs cat

Length of output: 266


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check the GraphQL schema file for feed-related definitions
cat server/lib/orcasite_web/graphql/schema.ex

# Look for any feed types or resolvers in the GraphQL directory
fd . server/lib/orcasite_web/graphql -t f -x cat {}

# Check for any feed-related modules that might use the online status
fd feed --type f --full-path server/lib/orcasite -x cat {}

Length of output: 40021

@skanderm skanderm merged commit 394be46 into main Nov 20, 2024
9 checks passed
@skanderm skanderm deleted the skander/update-online-feed branch November 20, 2024 02:08
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants