-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 141
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[release-4.14] OCPBUGS-33721: use a forked version of j-keck/arping that fixes a threading issue #2170
[release-4.14] OCPBUGS-33721: use a forked version of j-keck/arping that fixes a threading issue #2170
Conversation
here is the PR for the upstream version j-keck/arping#17 ' using sock.deinitialize() outside of the goroutine that is using the socket leaves the potential for erroneous and unexpected behavior. When calling Ping() very quickly the socket fd can be reused while a goroutine is still trying to read from it and cause the goroutine to deadlock. removing the sock.deinitialize() from the timeout select case as it will be taken care of by the goroutine upon its return' Signed-off-by: Jacob Tanenbaum <[email protected]>
@JacobTanenbaum: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-33721, which is invalid:
Comment The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
/retest-required |
/label backport-risk-assessed |
/approve |
/retest-required |
CI failed to retrieve the image from the registry /retest-required |
/label cherry-pick-approved |
/hold |
/jira refresh |
@JacobTanenbaum: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-33721, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. 7 validation(s) were run on this bug
Requesting review from QA contact: In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
/hold cancel |
/label qe-approved |
@JacobTanenbaum: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-33721, which is valid. 7 validation(s) were run on this bug
Requesting review from QA contact: In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/lgtm
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: JacobTanenbaum, trozet The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
@JacobTanenbaum: The following tests failed, say
Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
/retest-required |
e7b4b1a
into
openshift:release-4.14
@JacobTanenbaum: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-33721: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-33721 has been moved to the MODIFIED state. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
Fix included in accepted release 4.14.0-0.nightly-2024-06-06-030739 |
clearn cherry-pick of 1aa87b4
here is the PR for the upstream version j-keck/arping#17
'
using sock.deinitialize() outside of the goroutine that is using the socket leaves the potential for erroneous and unexpected behavior. When calling Ping() very quickly the socket fd can be reused while a goroutine is still trying to read from it and cause the goroutine to deadlock.
removing the sock.deinitialize() from the timeout select case as it will be taken care of by the goroutine upon its return'
- What this PR does and why is it needed
- Special notes for reviewers
- How to verify it
- Description for the changelog