Skip to content

Sigma Aggregation rule fixes

This check has been archived and is scheduled for deletion. Learn more about checks retention
Codecov / codecov/project succeeded Oct 4, 2023 in 0s

25.10% (+0.05%) compared to 3c9b23a

View this Pull Request on Codecov

25.10% (+0.05%) compared to 3c9b23a

Details

Codecov Report

Merging #622 (3f2e23a) into main (3c9b23a) will increase coverage by 0.05%.
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.
The diff coverage is 62.50%.

❗ Current head 3f2e23a differs from pull request most recent head 64e5f91. Consider uploading reports for the commit 64e5f91 to get more accurate results

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##               main     #622      +/-   ##
============================================
+ Coverage     25.04%   25.10%   +0.05%     
- Complexity      943      947       +4     
============================================
  Files           255      255              
  Lines         11123    11139      +16     
  Branches       1242     1246       +4     
============================================
+ Hits           2786     2796      +10     
- Misses         8086     8091       +5     
- Partials        251      252       +1     
Files Coverage Δ
...ecurityanalytics/rules/backend/OSQueryBackend.java 66.81% <100.00%> (ø)
.../securityanalytics/rules/backend/QueryBackend.java 64.54% <100.00%> (+0.32%) ⬆️
...curityanalytics/rules/objects/SigmaDetections.java 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
...a/org/opensearch/securityanalytics/model/Rule.java 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
...tyanalytics/rules/aggregation/AggregationItem.java 94.73% <66.66%> (-5.27%) ⬇️
...opensearch/securityanalytics/util/RuleIndices.java 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
...ch/securityanalytics/findings/FindingsService.java 35.89% <50.00%> (-0.59%) ⬇️
...lytics/transport/TransportIndexDetectorAction.java 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)

... and 1 file with indirect coverage changes