Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add boosting k-NN exact search blog #3448

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Nov 19, 2024
Merged
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
123 changes: 123 additions & 0 deletions _posts/2024-11-13-boosting-k-nn-exact-search.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,123 @@
---
layout: post
title: "Boosting k-NN exact search performance"
authors:
- ryanbogan
- jmazane
- vamshin
- kolchfa
date: 2024-11-13
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please update to today's date - 2024-11-19

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Done

kolchfa-aws marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved Hide resolved
categories:
- technical-posts
has_science_table: true
meta_keywords: exact k-NN search in OpenSearch, SIMD optimizations, query performance, relevance scoring, latency management
kolchfa-aws marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved Hide resolved
meta_description: Learn how to achieve precise, high-performance search with exact k-NN in OpenSearch.
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please update the meta with the following:

meta _keywords: k-NN search performance, SIMD in OpenSearch, script score queries, performance optimization, machine learning, exact K-NN

meta_description: Boost exact k-NN search performance in OpenSearch using SIMD optimizations and script_score queries. Discover real-world performance gains for efficient vector similarity searches in machine learning applications.

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Updated

kolchfa-aws marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved Hide resolved
---

Exact k-nearest neighbor (k-NN) search in OpenSearch allows you to define custom scoring functions to retrieve documents based on their proximity to a query vector. This method provides highly accurate search results, making it ideal when you need precise, deterministic matches.

Using OpenSearch's `script_score` queries, you can perform exact k-NN searches to find the closest neighbors to a query vector. This query type allows you to create complex scoring functions that account for factors like document attributes, user preferences, or external data.

The exact k-NN search is especially effective for datasets with a few hundred to a few thousand documents, as it guarantees perfect recall (1.0). This method is often more suitable for small or specialized datasets, where the computational overhead of approximate k-NN may outweigh its speed advantages. For larger datasets, however, approximate search can be a better choice for managing latency.
kolchfa-aws marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved Hide resolved

## Using Lucene's SIMD optimizations for faster k-NN search

The release of [Lucene 9.7](https://lucene.apache.org/core/9_7_0/index.html) brought in Project Panama's Java Vector API, which accelerates k-NN vector calculations through Single Instruction, Multiple Data (SIMD) operations. SIMD enables CPUs to run the same operation on multiple data points simultaneously, speeding up search tasks that rely on data-parallel processing.
kolchfa-aws marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved Hide resolved

In OpenSearch 2.15, SIMD optimizations were added to the k-NN plugin's script scoring, resulting in significant performance gains on CPUs with SIMD support, such as AVX2 or AVX512 on x86, or NEON on ARM. Further improvements in OpenSearch 2.17 introduced Lucene's new vector format, which includes optimized memory-mapped file access. Together, these enhancements significantly reduce search latency for exact k-NN searches on supported hardware.
kolchfa-aws marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved Hide resolved

## How to run exact k-NN search

To get started with exact k-NN search, create an index with one or more `knn_vector` fields that store vector data:

```json
PUT my-knn-index-1
{
"mappings": {
"properties": {
"my_vector1": { "type": "knn_vector", "dimension": 2 },
"my_vector2": { "type": "knn_vector", "dimension": 4 }
}
}
}
```

Next, index some sample data:

```json
POST _bulk
{ "index": { "_index": "my-knn-index-1", "_id": "1" } }
{ "my_vector1": [1.5, 2.5], "price": 12.2 }
{ "index": { "_index": "my-knn-index-1", "_id": "2" } }
{ "my_vector1": [2.5, 3.5], "price": 7.1 }
// Additional documents omitted for brevity
```

Finally, run an exact k-NN search using the `script_score` query:

```json
GET my-knn-index-1/_search
{
"size": 4,
"query": {
"script_score": {
"query": { "match_all": {} },
"script": {
"source": "knn_score",
"lang": "knn",
"params": {
"field": "my_vector2",
"query_value": [2.0, 3.0, 5.0, 6.0],
"space_type": "l2"
}
}
}
}
}
```

For more information about exact k-NN search and `script_score` queries, see [Exact k-NN with scoring script](https://opensearch.org/docs/latest/search-plugins/knn/knn-score-script/). You'll find detailed guides to help you configure k-NN exact search and make the most of custom scoring.

## Experiments show real-world performance gains

To measure the impact of these optimizations, we conducted A/B tests comparing OpenSearch 2.14 to OpenSearch 2.15 and 2.17 in a single-node cluster.

### Cluster configuration

|Dataset |Cohere 1m |
|--- |--- |
|Data nodes |1 |
|CPUs |8 |
|EBS Volume (GB) |500 |
kolchfa-aws marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved Hide resolved

### Results

The following table provides latency comparison between OpenSearch versions 2.14 and 2.15.
kolchfa-aws marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved Hide resolved

|Space type |Version |50th percentile latency (ms) |90th percentile latency (ms) |99th percentile latency (ms) |
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Lets just look at 2.14 vs 2.17 and remove this table.

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Done

|--- |--- |--- |--- |--- |
|**Inner product** |2.14 |668.84378 |816.95014 |948.21019 |
|| 2.15 |481.71112 |499.61605 |519.03619 |
|| **Improvement** |27.98% |38.84% |45.26% |
|**L2** |2.14 |670.98628 |682.84925 |693.12135 |
|| 2.15 |503.96816 |520.86304 |537.51321 |
|| **Improvement** |24.89% |23.72% |22.45% |

The following table provides latency comparison between OpenSearch versions 2.14 and 2.17.
kolchfa-aws marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved Hide resolved

|Space type |Version |50th percentile latency (ms) |90th percentile latency (ms) |99th percentile latency (ms) |
|--- |--- |--- |--- |--- |
|**Inner product** |2.14 |668.84378 |816.95014 |948.21019 |
||2.17 |99.58072 |117.0792 |121.36626 |
||**Improvement** |85.11% |85.67% |87.20% |
|**L2**|2.14 |670.98628 |682.84925 |693.12135 |
| | 2.17 |104.36596 |118.85475 |127.60656 |
|| **Improvement** |84.45% |82.59% |81.59% |

### Conclusion

The tests showed that OpenSearch's new SIMD optimizations resulted in significant latency reductions, especially for the inner product space type, which saw up to an 87% latency reduction at the 99th percentile.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can we generalize SIMD to "new SIMD support and optimized memory access". We added optimized memory access in 2.17

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Done


## What's next for exact k-NN search?

kolchfa-aws marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved Hide resolved
Future OpenSearch updates will provide even more flexibility for k-NN search. You'll be able to switch between exact and approximate search directly at query time. Additionally, future versions will provide the ability to specify which fields build indexes for exact and approximate search types. Stay tuned for these updates as we continue to improve OpenSearch's k-NN search capabilities.
kolchfa-aws marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved Hide resolved
Loading