Add precinct-level results for the 2016 primaries in Lavaca County...? #81
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
NOTE: There are four separate vote groups in this file, as there were four separate vote groups in the ASC file. However, I have no idea what each of them is supposed to mean; there's no record of any details regarding Lavaca County's vote breakdowns. Perhaps we need to ask the county what "Vote Groups 1-4' were for them?
Field
votes
is correct, and I just have placeholder fields1
,2
,3
,4
.If I had to guess, I'd guess 4 = early votes; 3 = election day; 2,1 = ?? There are too many of them to plausibly all be absentee, and they're certainly not provisional.