feat: add ora filter for submission step rendering

[BryanttV]

Description

This PR triggers the ORA submission view filter. This filter changes the default template by a custom template with a warning message notifying the student that the Turnitin plagiarism check is enabled.

Dependencies

This PR needs the new ORA submission view filter:

• feat: add ORA filter for submission view rendering intervention openedx-filters#158

Supporting Information

These changes are based on those proposed in the following ADR

How to Test

Using Tutor:

1. Install this xblock with changes in this branch in the LMS/CMS services.

2. Install openedx-filters in the LMS/CMS services with these changes.

3. Install platform-plugin-turnitin in the LMS/CMS services with the changes in the ora filter branch.

4. Add the Open edX Filters configuration to your environment and restart the services. You can use this inline plugin:

   name: filters-settings
   version: 0.1.0
   patches:
     openedx-common-settings: |
       OPEN_EDX_FILTERS_CONFIG = {
         "org.openedx.learning.ora.submission_view.render.started.v1": {
           "fail_silently": False,
           "pipeline": [
             "platform_plugin_turnitin.extensions.filters.ORASubmissionViewTurnitinWarning",
           ]
         },
       }

5. In a unit of the course create a new ora assessment.

6. In the LMS, in the submission step (1. Your Response), you'll see:

   

[openedx-webhooks]

Thanks for the pull request, @BryanttV! Please note that it may take us up to several weeks or months to complete a review and merge your PR.

Feel free to add as much of the following information to the ticket as you can:

• supporting documentation
• Open edX discussion forum threads
• timeline information ("this must be merged by XX date", and why that is)
• partner information ("this is a course on edx.org")
• any other information that can help Product understand the context for the PR

All technical communication about the code itself will be done via the GitHub pull request interface. As a reminder, our process documentation is here.

Please let us know once your PR is ready for our review and all tests are green.

[BryanttV]

Hi @pomegranited, this PR is part of the implementation of the ADR for lightweight extension points, could you take a look at it? Thanks!

[mariajgrimaldi]

This looks good! Although we're missing some tests, could we add some? Thanks!

[BryanttV]

Hi @mariajgrimaldi, thanks for the review! I added some tests: f4156f2

[pomegranited]

👍 Works great, thank you @BryanttV !

Could you merge latest master to get test passing again, and I'll merge :)

• I tested this using the PR description, both with and without the added filters to ensure no errors.
• I read through the code
• I checked for accessibility issues by navigating with my keyboard.
• Includes documentation
• User-facing strings are extracted for translation N/A

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 95.05%. Comparing base (00934e2) to head (8ced069).

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #2204   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   95.04%   95.05%           
=======================================
  Files         191      191           
  Lines       21045    21083   +38     
  Branches     1902     1903    +1     
=======================================
+ Hits        20002    20040   +38     
  Misses        779      779           
  Partials      264      264           

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests	95.05% <100.00%> (+<0.01%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[openedx-webhooks]

@BryanttV 🎉 Your pull request was merged! Please take a moment to answer a two question survey so we can improve your experience in the future.