-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 56
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Basic Evaluation #23
Basic Evaluation #23
Conversation
Update 2021-11-20 in testset
| 0 | 0.202 +- 0.03 | 6.2 | | ||
| 1 | 0.211 +- 0.03 | 6.4 | | ||
| 2 | 0.216 +- 0.03 | 6.5 | | ||
| 3 - 4 | 0.211 +- 0.02 |6.3 | |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It's very odd the 0th hour horizon is the same as the 24-48 hour horizon.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yea it is a bit. I suspect this might be due to the model being trained expecting live pv data.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ive added this to the Readme.md under the evaluation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Okay, that could explain it. Is the current model trained without any pv_dropout at all?
|
||
site = PVSite( | ||
latitude=pv_row["latitude"], | ||
longitude=pv_row["longitude"], |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Good next task, that i could do could be add in the tilt and orientation code
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yea I agree, we have to do that for the trained model, right?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, we would need to.
Pull Request
Description
Add evaluations model which pull data from
Fixes #2
How Has This Been Tested?
Added tests + ran on a small tests set
Checklist: