[chore] Mention JavaAgent v2.0.0 default behaviour #1533
There are no files selected for viewing
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
|
|
@@ -29,6 +29,9 @@ updated to the stable HTTP semantic conventions, they: | |
| - May drop the environment variable in their next major version and emit only | ||
| the stable HTTP and networking conventions. | ||
|
|
||
| The OpenTelemetry Java Agent [v2.0.0](https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-java-instrumentation/releases/tag/v2.0.0) and later already defaults to the stable | ||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment. thanks for the clarification! should this text belong in the javaagent docs? I believe this doc is intended for instrumentation authors and telemetry backends rather than the end-users of specific instrumentation. I don't mind having it here either, but then I think we need a section for instrumentation-specific behavior that would initially contain Java instrumentation agent. Curious what @trask thinks. There was a problem hiding this comment.
I think that would probably be a better place, until we solve the more general questions in #534 There was a problem hiding this comment. Similar to @TylerHelmuth in #534, I would probably not have stumbled upon this info in the Java agent docs, since I was (via web search and general reading about metrics and their attributes) coming from the semconv docs. |
||
| conventions -- you do not have to opt into them. | ||
|
|
||
| ## Summary of changes | ||
|
|
||
| This section summarizes the changes made to the HTTP semantic conventions | ||
|
|
||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I wonder if this whole section above is adding to the confusion. It was a good part of the blog post, but I wonder if the document here should just focus on the summary of changes?