-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 175
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
add User-agent OS attributes #1434
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
The PR is mostly a copy and paste from the OS attributes current definition to the user_agent's attributes, is there a way to reference them but applying the "user_agent" prefix? |
This PR was marked stale due to lack of activity. It will be closed in 7 days. |
|
||
## User-agent OS Attributes | ||
|
||
Describes the OS user-agent attributes. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Could you please describe the use-case for these attributes? is there any instrumentation or semantic convention that's supposed to populate it?
We usually add attributes along with the convention (span/metric/resource/event) that uses them - this usually results in more specific attribute definition and more clarity for those who want to populate the attribute on other conventions.
So, could we define such convention and/or document the use-case in some other way?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Could you please describe the use-case for these attributes?
For example, to understand which are the source OSes that are making requests to your system. This could be used from a Nginx Ingress Controller log, which records all requests UserAgent's.
is there any instrumentation or semantic convention that's supposed to populate it?
There is an ongoing PR in the collector: open-telemetry/opentelemetry-collector-contrib#35458
We usually add attributes along with the convention (span/metric/resource/event) that uses them - this usually results in more specific attribute definition and more clarity for those who want to populate the attribute on other conventions.
From the collector point of view, these attributes are agnostic to its location, they will be extracted from any defined context (span/metric/resource/event). I would like to use it to populate a Nginx Ingress Controller event, but it is not defined in Semconv yet (#982). Would it make sense to add a Nginx log example and explain how these attributes could be extracted?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@lmolkova How could we proceed with this PR? In which section could I add the use-case? brief field?
If a proof of concept is needed beforehand, we could unblock open-telemetry/opentelemetry-collector-contrib#35886 (comment) by just referencing this PR for now.
brief: > | ||
The operating system type. | ||
stability: experimental | ||
- id: user_agent.os.description |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
is this needed? I don't see it in ECS, and I'm not sure what you would populate it with via https://github.com/ua-parser/uap-core
The version string of the operating system as defined in | ||
[Version Attributes](/docs/resource/README.md#version-attributes). | ||
examples: ['14.2.1', '18.04.1'] | ||
- id: user_agent.os.build_id |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
same question for this attribute, thanks
Fixes #1433
Changes
Please provide a brief description of the changes here.
Note: if the PR is touching an area that is not listed in the existing areas, or the area does not have sufficient domain experts coverage, the PR might be tagged as experts needed and move slowly until experts are identified.
Merge requirement checklist
[chore]