Build Ubuntu CI containers on GitHub Actions #85
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Spencer Wilson <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Spencer Wilson <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Spencer Wilson <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Spencer Wilson <[email protected]>
SWilson4
force-pushed
the
sw-update-ubuntu
branch
from
57dac1d to
ec2caa4
Compare
|
@SWilson4 looks like I need to make a dockerhub token? anything else? |
| - x86_64 | ||
| distro: | ||
| - focal | ||
| - jammy |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Why Jammy? It's not listed in https://github.com/open-quantum-safe/liboqs/blob/main/PLATFORMS.md
Focal is listed, but shouldn't be (if this lands) -- so remove this once PLATFORMS gets updated?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
My intent was to update PLATFORMS.md to list support for Focal, Jammy, and Noble (i.e., every Ubuntu LTS version still receiving standard security maintenance) on x86_64 and arm64. Do we really want to support only the latest LTS? Focal will be receiving security updates for another year and Jammy for another three.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Makes some sense -- although I would limit this to the last two LTS' to also minimize our support obligation (if we see it and act on it as such, i.e., to respond/fix issues found on any Tier 1 platform listed).
But is it really necessary & worth while running all platforms at every push/PR? What about running only latest on push/PR and latest-1 only in the weekly regression and release runs?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
That seems reasonable to me.
It would be nice but not necessary to have the dockerhub username (oqsbot) saved in a non-secret variable. Other than that nothing. |
|
@SWilson4 I've added |
What does it take to also add it to oqs-demos, @ryjones ? Would allow implementing open-quantum-safe/oqs-demos#294 |
Disregard. It already works there -- just wonder why now :-) |
Signed-off-by: Spencer Wilson <[email protected]>
SWilson4
force-pushed
the
sw-update-ubuntu
branch
from
3898af2 to
cab34a7
Compare
|
I'm going to merge now so that I can try out these images in liboqs CI. I may need to add additional dependencies in a follow-up PR. |
|
This failed at merge due to an incorrect Docker Hub login. :( Could you please take a look @ryjones? |
|
@SWilson4 fixed :) |
This PR attempts to accomplish the following:
liboqs,Fixes #81, fixes #74.
Related issues: open-quantum-safe/liboqs#1780.
I'm leaving this as draft until the necessary environment variables/secrets are added (cc @ryjones). And, until it's not a Friday, since this could break all of our CI, and I'd rather not deal with that on the weekend. :)
I may need to further update these Dockerfiles (e.g., to add a dependency) once I have a chance to use them in liboqs CI while working on open-quantum-safe/liboqs#1780.