Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add Ocsigenserver 2.9 (OCaml 4.06 compatible) #11340

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 1, 2018
Merged

Add Ocsigenserver 2.9 (OCaml 4.06 compatible) #11340

merged 1 commit into from
Feb 1, 2018

Conversation

vasilisp
Copy link
Contributor

@vasilisp vasilisp commented Feb 1, 2018

No description provided.

@camelus
Copy link
Contributor

camelus commented Feb 1, 2018

✅ All lint checks passed ff97dd2
  • These packages passed lint tests: ocsigenserver.2.9

✅ Installability check (8254 → 8255)
  • new installable packages (1): ocsigenserver.2.9

@vasilisp
Copy link
Contributor Author

vasilisp commented Feb 1, 2018

The CI failures do not look relevant.

"tyxml" {>= "4.0.0"}
("dbm" | "sqlite3" | "pgocaml")
"ipaddr" {>= "2.1"}
"camlp4" # to force building tyxml.parser
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Crap. I missed it, sorry. @Drup is this deprecated ?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It is, yes.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@jpdeplaix, thanks and no worries. For info, ocsigen/ocsigenserver#124 replaces tyxml.parser with xml-light and gets rid of camlp4, among other old cruft. But I need to spend a few weeks on it before we finally do the migration.

@kit-ty-kate
Copy link
Member

Fair enough. Thanks, merging now.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants