-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
unsats #16
Comments
wierdly enough when i run |
uncinate fasciculus unsat fixed in uberon See details here[uncinate fasciculus](http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/UBERON_0003044) SubClassOf [part_of](http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/BFO_0000050) some [pontine tegmentum](http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/UBERON_0003023) seems wrongUncinate fasciculus definition - "Pathway arising from the fastigial nucleus to the vestibular nuclei, reticular formation, motor neurons of brainstem and cervical spinal cord" seems like a legit uberon issue, not sure why this didnt get picked up with uberon? does uberon not have the disjoint Nothing EquivalentTo (part_of some forebrain) and (part_of some brainstem)? |
posterior commissure SubClassOf Nothing error coming from uberon and dhba classifying it differently: DHBA: UBERON: On research, hard to say which is actually correct given the commissure connects midbrain and diencephalon structures |
Olfactory bulb: I think this is the issue: I'm guessing that there is white matter in the allocortex too but also this seems wrong: |
Thinking about this - these inconsistencies must be coming from a clash between the partonomy coming from JSON and spatial disjointness axioms in Uberon expressed above as Nothing EquivalentTo (part_of some forebrain) and (part_of some brainstem) [uberon.owl] (I have a vague recollection of having been through this last time I worked on this. Or maybe I was using a version of Uberon that lacked the spatial disjointness.) I think we need to We could also use the approach we developed for HubMap - using UberGraph queries to test the validity and type of each relationship. This would be a lot more work though, so we'd need to consider carefully if we want to take it on. Note - for ease of reviewing, maybe we should use longer display names for the ABA terms by including species in brackets. The inconsistency reports above are confusing because it's hard to tell ABA and Uberon terms apart - many have the same names. |
These are good examples I think
-> overlaps , or we make the term PBA_294022044 'white matter of neocortex'
part_of -> connected_to ? |
will do this for now
This sound a bit too fun and things we can spend too many hours puzzle-solving :p |
Another good example
-> Also we should add the spatial disjointness axiom to Uberon if it's missing. |
These kinds of issues are inevitable in a hierarchy built for annotating an atlas. |
Looks like unsats are a bit more complicated
will try using robot explain to figure out some stuff
tagging @dosumis
olfactory tubercle SubClassOf Nothing
uncinate fasciculus SubClassOf Nothing
taenia tectum SubClassOf Nothing
posterior commissure SubClassOf Nothing
islands of Calleja SubClassOf Nothing
scattered islands of Calleja SubClassOf Nothing
optic tract SubClassOf Nothing
major island of Calleja SubClassOf Nothing
olfactory bulb SubClassOf Nothing
indusium griseum SubClassOf Nothing
Axiom Impact
Axioms used 9 times
Axioms used 7 times
Axioms used 4 times
Axioms used 3 times
Axioms used 2 times
Axioms used 1 times
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: