Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update dependency vscode-languageserver-textdocument to v1.0.12 #54

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Mar 16, 2023

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
vscode-languageserver-textdocument (source) 1.0.4 -> 1.0.12 age adoption passing confidence

Release Notes

Microsoft/vscode-languageserver-node (vscode-languageserver-textdocument)

v1.0.7

Compare Source

v1.0.6

Compare Source

v1.0.5

Compare Source


Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR is behind base branch, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

@sonarcloud
Copy link

sonarcloud bot commented Mar 16, 2023

Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!    Quality Gate passed

Bug A 0 Bugs
Vulnerability A 0 Vulnerabilities
Security Hotspot A 0 Security Hotspots
Code Smell A 0 Code Smells

No Coverage information No Coverage information
0.0% 0.0% Duplication

@yegor256
Copy link
Member

@rultor please, try to merge

@rultor
Copy link
Collaborator

rultor commented Mar 16, 2023

@rultor please, try to merge

@yegor256 OK, I'll try to merge now. You can check the progress of the merge here

@rultor
Copy link
Collaborator

rultor commented Mar 16, 2023

@rultor please, try to merge

@renovate[bot] @yegor256 Oops, I failed. You can see the full log here (spent 14s)

+ set -e
+ set -o pipefail
++ dirname ./run.sh
+ cd .
+ echo 3763933
+ echo '2.0-SNAPSHOT BUILD'
2.0-SNAPSHOT BUILD
+ date
Thu 16 Mar 2023 11:34:59 AM CET
+ uptime
 11:34:59 up 112 days, 17:13,  0 users,  load average: 0.16, 0.73, 0.45
+ cat
com.rultor.spi.Profile: There is no 'merge' section in .rultor.yml for branch master in repo objectionary/eo-vscode
	at com.rultor.agents.req.StartsRequest.docker(StartsRequest.java:350)
	at com.rultor.agents.req.StartsRequest.vars(StartsRequest.java:255)
	at com.rultor.agents.req.StartsRequest.script(StartsRequest.java:148)
	at com.rultor.agents.req.StartsRequest.process(StartsRequest.java:109)
	at com.rultor.agents.AbstractAgent.execute(AbstractAgent.java:70)
	at com.rultor.spi.Agent.execute(Agent.java:84)
	at com.rultor.Routine.process(Routine.java:202)
	at com.rultor.Routine.unsafe_aroundBody0(Routine.java:180)
	at com.rultor.Routine.run(Routine.java:1)
	at org.aspectj.runtime.reflect.JoinPointImpl.proceed(JoinPointImpl.java:179)
	at com.jcabi.aspects.aj.MethodInterrupter.wrap(MethodInterrupter.java:108)
	at com.rultor.Routine.unsafe(Routine.java:175)
	at com.rultor.Routine.run(Routine.java:142)
	at com.jcabi.log.VerboseRunnable.run(VerboseRunnable.java:190)
	at com.jcabi.aspects.aj.MethodScheduler.lambda./run.sh(MethodScheduler.java:194)
	at java.base/java.util.concurrent.Executors.call(Executors.java:539)
	at java.base/java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.runAndReset(FutureTask.java:305)
	at java.base/java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.run(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:305)
	at java.base/java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1136)
	at java.base/java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:635)
	at com.jcabi.log.VerboseThreads.run(VerboseThreads.java:222)
	at java.base/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:833)

+ exit -1
'cid' file is absent, most probably the Docker container wasn't started correctly

@sonarcloud
Copy link

sonarcloud bot commented Jul 16, 2023

Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!    Quality Gate passed

Bug A 0 Bugs
Vulnerability A 0 Vulnerabilities
Security Hotspot A 0 Security Hotspots
Code Smell A 0 Code Smells

No Coverage information No Coverage information
0.0% 0.0% Duplication

@renovate renovate bot changed the title Update dependency vscode-languageserver-textdocument to v1.0.8 Update dependency vscode-languageserver-textdocument to v1.0.11 Sep 26, 2023
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/vscode-languageserver-textdocument-1.x-lockfile branch from e207fe9 to 00bd76a Compare September 26, 2023 10:36
@sonarcloud
Copy link

sonarcloud bot commented Sep 26, 2023

Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!    Quality Gate passed

Bug A 0 Bugs
Vulnerability A 0 Vulnerabilities
Security Hotspot A 0 Security Hotspots
Code Smell A 0 Code Smells

No Coverage information No Coverage information
0.0% 0.0% Duplication

1 similar comment
Copy link

sonarcloud bot commented Dec 3, 2023

Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!    Quality Gate passed

Bug A 0 Bugs
Vulnerability A 0 Vulnerabilities
Security Hotspot A 0 Security Hotspots
Code Smell A 0 Code Smells

No Coverage information No Coverage information
0.0% 0.0% Duplication

@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/vscode-languageserver-textdocument-1.x-lockfile branch from 00bd76a to fb2059d Compare July 31, 2024 17:02
@renovate renovate bot changed the title Update dependency vscode-languageserver-textdocument to v1.0.11 Update dependency vscode-languageserver-textdocument to v1.0.12 Jul 31, 2024
Copy link

sonarcloud bot commented Jul 31, 2024

Please retry analysis of this Pull-Request directly on SonarCloud

Copy link

sonarcloud bot commented Aug 28, 2024

1 similar comment
Copy link

sonarcloud bot commented Nov 5, 2024

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants