Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update dependency jacoco to v0.8.12 #43

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Mar 16, 2023

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
jacoco (source) 0.8.7 -> 0.8.12 age adoption passing confidence

Release Notes

jacoco/jacoco (jacoco)

v0.8.12: 0.8.12

New Features

  • JaCoCo now officially supports Java 22 (GitHub #​1596).
  • Experimental support for Java 23 class files (GitHub #​1553).

Fixed bugs

  • Branches added by the Kotlin compiler for functions with default arguments and having more than 32 parameters are filtered out during generation of report (GitHub #​1556).
  • Branch added by the Kotlin compiler version 1.5.0 and above for reading from lateinit property is filtered out during generation of report (GitHub #​1568).

Non-functional Changes

  • JaCoCo now depends on ASM 9.7 (GitHub #​1600).

v0.8.11: 0.8.11

New Features

  • JaCoCo now officially supports Java 21 (GitHub #​1520).
  • Experimental support for Java 22 class files (GitHub #​1479).
  • Part of bytecode generated by the Java compilers for exhaustive switch expressions is filtered out during generation of report (GitHub #​1472).
  • Part of bytecode generated by the Java compilers for record patterns is filtered out during generation of report (GitHub #​1473).

Fixed bugs

  • Instrumentation should not cause VerifyError when the last local variable of method parameters is overridden in the method body to store a value of type long or double (GitHub #​893).
  • Restore exec file compatibility with versions from 0.7.5 to 0.8.8 in case of class files with zero line numbers (GitHub #​1492).

Non-functional Changes

  • jacoco-maven-plugin now requires at least Java 8 (GitHub #​1466, #​1468).
  • JaCoCo build now requires at least Maven 3.5.4 (GitHub #​1467).
  • Maven 3.9.2 should not produce warnings for jacoco-maven-plugin (GitHub #​1468).
  • JaCoCo build now requires JDK 17 (GitHub #​1482).
  • JaCoCo now depends on ASM 9.6 (GitHub #​1518).

v0.8.10: 0.8.10

Fixed bugs
  • Agent should not require configuration of permissions for SecurityManager outside of its codeBase (GitHub #​1425).

v0.8.9: 0.8.9

New Features
  • JaCoCo now officially supports Java 19 and 20 (GitHub #​1371, #​1386).
  • Experimental support for Java 21 class files (GitHub #​1386).
  • Add parameter to include the current project in the report-aggregate Maven goal (GitHub #​1007).
  • Component accessors generated by the Java compilers for records are filtered out during generation of report. Contributed by Tesla Zhang (GitHub #​1393).
Fixed bugs
  • Agent should not open java.lang package to unnamed module of the application class loader (GitHub #​1334).
Non-functional Changes

v0.8.8: 0.8.8

New Features

  • JaCoCo now officially supports Java 17 and 18 (GitHub #​1282, #​1198).
  • Experimental support for Java 19 class files (GitHub #​1264).
  • Part of bytecode generated by the Java compilers for assert statement is filtered out during generation of report (GitHub #​1196).
  • Branch added by the Kotlin compiler version 1.6.0 and above for "unsafe" cast operator is filtered out during generation of report (GitHub #​1266).
  • Improved support for multiple JaCoCo runtimes in the same VM (GitHub #​1057).

Fixed bugs

  • Fixed NullPointerException during filtering (GitHub #​1189).
  • Fix range for debug symbols of method parameters (GitHub #​1246).

Non-functional Changes

  • JaCoCo now depends on ASM 9.2 (GitHub #​1206).
  • Messages of exceptions occurring during analysis or instrumentation now include JaCoCo version (GitHub #​1217).

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

@yegor256
Copy link
Member

@rultor please, try to merge

@rultor
Copy link
Contributor

rultor commented Mar 16, 2023

@rultor please, try to merge

@yegor256 OK, I'll try to merge now. You can check the progress of the merge here

@rultor
Copy link
Contributor

rultor commented Mar 16, 2023

@rultor please, try to merge

@renovate[bot] @yegor256 Oops, I failed. You can see the full log here (spent 4min)

\u001b[0K
\u001b[4A\u001b[1m<\u001b[0;1m-------------> 7% EXECUTING [1m 45s]\u001b[m\u001b[37D\u001b[1B> IDLE\u001b[6D\u001b[1B> IDLE\u001b[6D\u001b[1B\u001b[1m> :compileJava\u001b[m\u001b[14D\u001b[1B\u001b[4A\u001b[1m<\u001b[0;1m-------------> 7% EXECUTING [1m 46s]\u001b[m\u001b[37D\u001b[4B\u001b[4A\u001b[1m<\u001b[0;1m-------------> 7% EXECUTING [1m 47s]\u001b[m\u001b[37D\u001b[4B\u001b[4A\u001b[1m<\u001b[0;1m-------------> 7% EXECUTING [1m 48s]\u001b[m\u001b[37D\u001b[4B\u001b[4A\u001b[1m<\u001b[0;1m-------------> 7% EXECUTING [1m 49s]\u001b[m\u001b[37D\u001b[4B\u001b[4A\u001b[1m<\u001b[0;1m-------------> 7% EXECUTING [1m 50s]\u001b[m\u001b[37D\u001b[4B\u001b[4A\u001b[1m<\u001b[0;1m-------------> 7% EXECUTING [1m 51s]\u001b[m\u001b[37D\u001b[4B\u001b[4A\u001b[1m<\u001b[0;1m-------------> 7% EXECUTING [1m 52s]\u001b[m\u001b[37D\u001b[4B\u001b[4A\u001b[1m<\u001b[0;1m-------------> 7% EXECUTING [1m 53s]\u001b[m\u001b[37D\u001b[4B\u001b[4A\u001b[1m<\u001b[0;1m-------------> 7% EXECUTING [1m 54s]\u001b[m\u001b[37D\u001b[4B\u001b[4A\u001b[1m<\u001b[0;1m-------------> 7% EXECUTING [1m 55s]\u001b[m\u001b[37D\u001b[4B\u001b[4A\u001b[1m<\u001b[0;1m-------------> 7% EXECUTING [1m 56s]\u001b[m\u001b[37D\u001b[4B\u001b[4A\u001b[1m<\u001b[0;1m-------------> 7% EXECUTING [1m 57s]\u001b[m\u001b[37D\u001b[4B\u001b[4A\u001b[1m<\u001b[0;1m-------------> 7% EXECUTING [1m 58s]\u001b[m\u001b[37D\u001b[4B\u001b[4A\u001b[1m<\u001b[0;1m-------------> 7% EXECUTING [1m 59s]\u001b[m\u001b[37D\u001b[4B\u001b[4A\u001b[0K
\u001b[1m> Task :patchPluginXml\u001b[m\u001b[0K
[gradle-intellij-plugin :repo:patchPluginXml] Patching plugin.xml: value of 'version[0.0.0]' tag will be set to '0.0.0'\u001b[0K
\u001b[1B\u001b[0K
\u001b[0K
\u001b[0K
\u001b[4A\u001b[1m<\u001b[0;32;1m==\u001b[0;39;1m-----------> 21% EXECUTING [1m 59s]\u001b[m\u001b[38D\u001b[1B> IDLE\u001b[6D\u001b[1B> IDLE\u001b[6D\u001b[1B> IDLE\u001b[6D\u001b[1B\u001b[4A\u001b[1m<\u001b[0;32;1m===\u001b[0;39;1m----------> 28% EXECUTING [1m 59s]\u001b[m\u001b[38D\u001b[3B\u001b[1m> :instrumentCode > Resolve dependencies of :detachedConfiguration2 > java-comp\u001b[m\u001b[79D\u001b[1B
\u001b[4A\u001b[1m> :instrumentCode > Resolve dependencies of :detachedConfiguration2 > java-gui-\u001b[m\u001b[79D\u001b[1B\u001b[1m> :instrumentCode > Resolve dependencies of :detachedConfiguration2 > java-comp\u001b[m\u001b[79D\u001b[1B\u001b[1m> :instrumentCode > Resolve dependencies of :detachedConfiguration2 > java-gui-\u001b[m\u001b[79D\u001b[1B\u001b[1m> :instrumentCode > Resolve dependencies of :detachedConfiguration2 > asm-all-7\u001b[m\u001b[79D\u001b[1B\u001b[2A> IDLE\u001b[0K\u001b[6D\u001b[2B\u001b[4A> IDLE\u001b[0K\u001b[6D\u001b[1B> IDLE\u001b[0K\u001b[6D\u001b[3B\u001b[5A\u001b[1m<\u001b[0;32;1m===\u001b[0;39;1m----------> 28% EXECUTING [2m]\u001b[m\u001b[0K\u001b[34D\u001b[5B\u001b[4A\u001b[1m> :instrumentCode > Resolve dependencies of :detachedConfiguration2 > forms-1.1\u001b[m\u001b[79D\u001b[3B\u001b[1m> :instrumentCode > Resolve dependencies of :detachedConfiguration2 > jdom-2.0.\u001b[m\u001b[79D\u001b[1B\u001b[1A> IDLE\u001b[0K\u001b[6D\u001b[1B\u001b[4A\u001b[1m> :instrumentCode > Resolve files of :detachedConfiguration2 > java-compiler-an\u001b[m\u001b[79D\u001b[1B\u001b[1m> :instrumentCode > Resolve files of :detachedConfiguration2 > java-gui-forms-r\u001b[m\u001b[79D\u001b[1B\u001b[1m> :instrumentCode > Resolve files of :detachedConfiguration2 > forms-1.1-previe\u001b[m\u001b[79D\u001b[1B\u001b[1m> :instrumentCode > Resolve files of :detachedConfiguration2 > asm-all-7.0.jar\u001b[m\u001b[78D\u001b[1B\u001b[2A\u001b[1m> :instrumentCode > Resolve files of :detachedConfiguration2 > jdom-2.0.6.jar >\u001b[m\u001b[79D\u001b[1B\u001b[1m> :instrumentCode > Resolve files of :detachedConfiguration2 > asm-all-7.0.jar \u001b[m\u001b[79D\u001b[1B\u001b[2A\u001b[1m> :instrumentCode > Resolve files of :detachedConfiguration2 > java-compiler-in\u001b[m\u001b[79D\u001b[1B\u001b[1m> :instrumentCode > Resolve files of :detachedConfiguration2 > java-gui-forms-c\u001b[m\u001b[79D\u001b[1B\u001b[4A> IDLE\u001b[0K\u001b[6D\u001b[1B> IDLE\u001b[0K\u001b[6D\u001b[1B> IDLE\u001b[0K\u001b[6D\u001b[2B\u001b[1A\u001b[1m> :instrumentCode\u001b[m\u001b[0K\u001b[17D\u001b[1B\u001b[5A\u001b[1m<\u001b[0;32;1m===\u001b[0;39;1m----------> 28% EXECUTING [2m 1s]\u001b[m\u001b[37D\u001b[5B\u001b[5A\u001b[1m<\u001b[0;32;1m====\u001b[0;39;1m---------> 35% EXECUTING [2m 1s]\u001b[m\u001b[37D\u001b[4B\u001b[1m> :jar\u001b[m\u001b[0K\u001b[6D\u001b[1B\u001b[5A\u001b[1m<\u001b[0;32;1m======\u001b[0;39;1m-------> 50% EXECUTING [2m 1s]\u001b[m\u001b[37D\u001b[4B\u001b[1m> :buildPlugin\u001b[m\u001b[14D\u001b[1B\u001b[5A\u001b[1m<\u001b[0;32;1m=======\u001b[0;39;1m------> 60% EXECUTING [2m 1s]\u001b[m\u001b[37D\u001b[4B\u001b[1m> :compileTestJava > Resolve dependencies of :testCompileClasspath\u001b[m\u001b[66D\u001b[1B\u001b[5A\u001b[1m<\u001b[0;32;1m=======\u001b[0;39;1m------> 60% EXECUTING [2m 2s]\u001b[m\u001b[37D\u001b[4B\u001b[1m> :compileTestJava\u001b[m\u001b[0K\u001b[18D\u001b[1B\u001b[5A\u001b[1m<\u001b[0;32;1m=========\u001b[0;39;1m----> 71% EXECUTING [2m 3s]\u001b[m\u001b[37D\u001b[4B\u001b[1m> :instrumentTestCode\u001b[m\u001b[21D\u001b[1B\u001b[5A\u001b[1m<\u001b[0;32;1m==========\u001b[0;39;1m---> 82% EXECUTING [2m 3s]\u001b[m\u001b[37D\u001b[4B\u001b[1m> :test\u001b[m\u001b[0K\u001b[7D\u001b[1B\u001b[1A\u001b[1m> :test > Resolve dependencies of :jacocoAgent > org.jacoco.agent-0.8.8.pom\u001b[m\u001b[75D\u001b[1B\u001b[1A\u001b[1m> :test > Resolve files of :jacocoAgent > org.jacoco.agent-0.8.8.jar > 111.4 Ki\u001b[m\u001b[79D\u001b[1B\u001b[1A\u001b[1m> :test\u001b[m\u001b[0K\u001b[7D\u001b[1B\u001b[5A\u001b[1m<\u001b[0;32;1m==========\u001b[0;39;1m---> 82% EXECUTING [2m 4s]\u001b[m\u001b[37D\u001b[5B\u001b[5A\u001b[1m<\u001b[0;32;1m==========\u001b[0;39;1m---> 82% EXECUTING [2m 5s]\u001b[m\u001b[37D\u001b[5B\u001b[5A\u001b[1m<\u001b[0;32;1m==========\u001b[0;39;1m---> 82% EXECUTING [2m 6s]\u001b[m\u001b[37D\u001b[5B\u001b[5A\u001b[1m<\u001b[0;32;1m==========\u001b[0;39;1m---> 82% EXECUTING [2m 7s]\u001b[m\u001b[37D\u001b[5B\u001b[1A\u001b[1m> :test > 0 tests completed\u001b[m\u001b[27D\u001b[1B\u001b[5A\u001b[1m<\u001b[0;32;1m==========\u001b[0;39;1m---> 82% EXECUTING [2m 8s]\u001b[m\u001b[37D\u001b[5B\u001b[4A\u001b[1m> :test > Executing test org.eolang.jetbrains.test.EoCommenterTest\u001b[m\u001b[66D\u001b[4B\u001b[5A\u001b[1m<\u001b[0;32;1m==========\u001b[0;39;1m---> 82% EXECUTING [2m 9s]\u001b[m\u001b[37D\u001b[5B\u001b[5A\u001b[0K
\u001b[1m> Task :test\u001b[m\u001b[0K
WARNING: An illegal reflective access operation has occurred\u001b[0K
WARNING: Illegal reflective access by com.intellij.openapi.util.JDOMUtil$2 (file:/home/r/.gradle/caches/modules-2/files-2.1/com.jetbrains.intellij.idea/ideaIC/2018.3.2/23b321b525e54fefd5a5e47371077a981833fb37/ideaIC-2018.3.2/lib/util.jar) to constructor com.sun.xml.internal.stream.XMLInputFactoryImpl()\u001b[0K
WARNING: Please consider reporting this to the maintainers of com.intellij.openapi.util.JDOMUtil$2\u001b[0K
WARNING: Use --illegal-access=warn to enable warnings of further illegal reflective access operations
WARNING: All illegal access operations will be denied in a future release
\u001b[0K
\u001b[0K
\u001b[0K
\u001b[0K
\u001b[0K
\u001b[5A\u001b[1m<\u001b[0;32;1m==========\u001b[0;39;1m---> 82% EXECUTING [2m 9s]\u001b[m\u001b[37D\u001b[1B\u001b[1m> :test > Executing test org.eolang.jetbrains.test.EoCommenterTest\u001b[m\u001b[66D\u001b[1B> IDLE\u001b[6D\u001b[1B> IDLE\u001b[6D\u001b[1B\u001b[1m> :test > 0 tests completed\u001b[m\u001b[27D\u001b[1B\u001b[5A\u001b[1m<\u001b[0;32;1m==========\u001b[0;39;1m---> 82% EXECUTING [2m 10s]\u001b[m\u001b[38D\u001b[5B\u001b[5A\u001b[1m<\u001b[0;32;1m==========\u001b[0;39;1m---> 82% EXECUTING [2m 11s]\u001b[m\u001b[38D\u001b[5B\u001b[5A\u001b[1m<\u001b[0;32;1m==========\u001b[0;39;1m---> 82% EXECUTING [2m 12s]\u001b[m\u001b[38D\u001b[5B\u001b[5A\u001b[1m<\u001b[0;32;1m==========\u001b[0;39;1m---> 82% EXECUTING [2m 13s]\u001b[m\u001b[38D\u001b[5B\u001b[5A\u001b[1m<\u001b[0;32;1m==========\u001b[0;39;1m---> 82% EXECUTING [2m 14s]\u001b[m\u001b[38D\u001b[5B\u001b[5A\u001b[1m<\u001b[0;32;1m==========\u001b[0;39;1m---> 82% EXECUTING [2m 15s]\u001b[m\u001b[38D\u001b[5B\u001b[5A\u001b[1m<\u001b[0;32;1m==========\u001b[0;39;1m---> 82% EXECUTING [2m 16s]\u001b[m\u001b[38D\u001b[5B\u001b[5A\u001b[1m<\u001b[0;32;1m==========\u001b[0;39;1m---> 82% EXECUTING [2m 17s]\u001b[m\u001b[38D\u001b[5B\u001b[5A\u001b[1m<\u001b[0;32;1m==========\u001b[0;39;1m---> 82% EXECUTING [2m 18s]\u001b[m\u001b[38D\u001b[5B\u001b[1A\u001b[1m> :test > 1 test completed\u001b[m\u001b[0K\u001b[26D\u001b[1B\u001b[4A\u001b[1m> :test > Executing test org.eolang.jetbrains.test.EoParsingTest1\u001b[m\u001b[0K\u001b[65D\u001b[3B\u001b[1m> :test > 2 tests completed\u001b[m\u001b[27D\u001b[1B\u001b[5A\u001b[0K
org.eolang.jetbrains.test.EoParsingTest1 > testParsingTestData \u001b[31mFAILED\u001b[39m\u001b[0K
    com.intellij.rt.execution.junit.FileComparisonFailure at EoParsingTest1.java:50\u001b[0K
\u001b[0K
org.eolang.jetbrains.test.EoParsingTestComments > testParsingTestData \u001b[31mFAILED\u001b[39m\u001b[0K
    com.intellij.rt.execution.junit.FileComparisonFailure at EoParsingTestComments.java:49
\u001b[0K
\u001b[0K
\u001b[0K
\u001b[0K
\u001b[0K
\u001b[5A\u001b[1m<\u001b[0;32;1m==========\u001b[0;39;1m---> 82% EXECUTING [2m 18s]\u001b[m\u001b[38D\u001b[1B> IDLE\u001b[6D\u001b[1B> IDLE\u001b[6D\u001b[1B> IDLE\u001b[6D\u001b[1B\u001b[1m> :test > 4 tests completed, 2 failed\u001b[m\u001b[37D\u001b[1B\u001b[5A\u001b[1m<\u001b[0;32;1m==========\u001b[0;39;1m---> 82% EXECUTING [2m 19s]\u001b[m\u001b[38D\u001b[5B\u001b[5A\u001b[0K
4 tests completed, 2 failed\u001b[0K
\u001b[3B\u001b[0K
\u001b[0K
\u001b[5A\u001b[1m<\u001b[0;32;1m==========\u001b[0;39;1m---> 82% EXECUTING [2m 19s]\u001b[m\u001b[38D\u001b[1B> IDLE\u001b[6D\u001b[1B> IDLE\u001b[0K\u001b[6D\u001b[1B> IDLE\u001b[6D\u001b[1B\u001b[1m> :test\u001b[m\u001b[7D\u001b[1B\u001b[5A\u001b[0K
\u001b[31;1m> Task :test\u001b[0;39m\u001b[31m FAILED\u001b[39m\u001b[0K
\u001b[0K
\u001b[31mFAILURE: \u001b[39m\u001b[31mBuild failed with an exception.\u001b[39m\u001b[0K
\u001b[0K
* What went wrong:
Execution failed for task ':test'.
\u001b[33m> \u001b[39mThere were failing tests. See the report at: file:///home/r/repo/build/reports/tests/test/index.html

* Try:
\u001b[33m> \u001b[39mRun with \u001b[1m--stacktrace\u001b[m option to get the stack trace.
\u001b[33m> \u001b[39mRun with \u001b[1m--info\u001b[m or \u001b[1m--debug\u001b[m option to get more log output.
\u001b[33m> \u001b[39mRun with \u001b[1m--scan\u001b[m to get full insights.

* Get more help at \u001b[1mhttps://help.gradle.org\u001b[m

\u001b[31;1mBUILD FAILED\u001b[0;39m in 2m 20s
17 actionable tasks: 17 executed
\u001b[0K
\u001b[0K
\u001b[0K
\u001b[0K
\u001b[0K
\u001b[5A\u001b[1m<\u001b[0;1m-------------> 0% WAITING\u001b[m\u001b[26D\u001b[1B> IDLE\u001b[6D\u001b[1B> IDLE\u001b[6D\u001b[1B> IDLE\u001b[6D\u001b[1B> IDLE\u001b[6D\u001b[1B\u001b[5A\u001b[2K\u001b[1B\u001b[2K\u001b[1B\u001b[2K\u001b[1B\u001b[2K\u001b[1B\u001b[2K\u001b[4A\u001b[0m\u001b[?12l\u001b[?25hcontainer 2a2b7cc516220663ea230b815bd892b59934be46e08efa8a64af62118ab0a7a7 is dead
Thu 16 Mar 2023 12:36:32 PM CET

@renovate renovate bot changed the title Update dependency jacoco to v0.8.8 Update dependency jacoco to v0.8.9 Apr 3, 2023
@cr-gpt
Copy link

cr-gpt bot commented Apr 3, 2023

Seems you are using me but didn't get OPENAI_API_KEY seted in Variables for this repo. you could follow readme for more information

@pr-codex
Copy link

pr-codex bot commented Apr 3, 2023

Tldr

This PR updates the Jacoco toolVersion from 0.8.7 to 0.8.9 in build.gradle.

Detailed summary

  • Updated Jacoco toolVersion from 0.8.7 to 0.8.9 in build.gradle.

@renovate renovate bot changed the title Update dependency jacoco to v0.8.9 Update dependency jacoco to v0.8.10 May 30, 2023
@renovate renovate bot changed the title Update dependency jacoco to v0.8.10 Update dependency jacoco to v0.8.11 Oct 16, 2023
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 16, 2023

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 35.60%. Comparing base (5a07317) to head (b00a0aa).

❗ Current head b00a0aa differs from pull request most recent head f011c92. Consider uploading reports for the commit f011c92 to get more accurate results

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##             master      #43   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage     35.60%   35.60%           
  Complexity       25       25           
=========================================
  Files            13       13           
  Lines           191      191           
  Branches          5        5           
=========================================
  Hits             68       68           
  Misses          119      119           
  Partials          4        4           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@renovate renovate bot changed the title Update dependency jacoco to v0.8.11 Update dependency jacoco to v0.8.12 Apr 2, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants