-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 18
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix/object parts changes #793
Conversation
The new (0.41.0+) node versions store object's part information as a LINK's payload, not a header info. Also, add payload size info, since it is also available now. The helper was also renamed since its name can be confused with the storage groups. Signed-off-by: Pavel Karpy <[email protected]>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Do we have any test for allowed deletions (incomplete objects)?
No. I am not sure if it can be done without additional support in our utils. For now we can only put big object and stop after N seconds? |
Let's create an issue and think about it separately then. |
@roman-khimov, test repo or cli? I agree such a test will be helpful, but do not see any easy solution without some object parts creation util. |
Test. We'll untangle from it. |
Parts of a split object cannot be deleted after the new split scheme. Ever, not when the root object is locked. Drop the outdated test and adapt the remaining control ones to the updated helpers. Closes #784. Signed-off-by: Pavel Karpy <[email protected]>
Such operations are prohibited with the new split scheme. Signed-off-by: Pavel Karpy <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Pavel Karpy <[email protected]>
a752942
to
1a3deb5
Compare
No description provided.