feat: switch from poetry to uv for environment management, and poetry to hatch for build backend #192
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
UV offers numerous benefits over poetry, first and foremost with its speed. Without using poetry to manage the environment, it then made sense to switch to
hatch
for the build-backend, as it is a much more targeted project and excellently documented when it comes to writing thepyproject.toml
.I manually reviewed the generated wheels and sdists (.tar.gz) artifacts produced by
uv build
andpoetry build
, and the only difference I can detect is in theMETADATA
file created in the sdist, which is upgraded to a newer version with slightly different ways of presenting largely the same information.A lot of the work ultimately came down to converting from the
poetry
-specific version specifier of^x.y.z
to the pep-compliant>=x.y.z,<x+1
, as well as=*
=>>=0.0.0
.