-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 224
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
chore: add compile-time assertions on generic arguments of stdlib functions #6981
Draft
michaeljklein
wants to merge
10
commits into
master
Choose a base branch
from
michaeljklein/stdlib-static-assertions
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Draft
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
10 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
c671b1e
change two assertions on generics to static assertions, wip finding s…
michaeljklein 4a701ed
Merge branch 'master' into michaeljklein/stdlib-static-assertions
michaeljklein e835376
rename ToRadix -> ToRadixUnsafe, ToBits -> ToBitsUnsafe, add size che…
michaeljklein 0896b08
wip implementing comptime static_assert, add tests for comptime stati…
michaeljklein ee45436
Merge branch 'master' into michaeljklein/stdlib-static-assertions
michaeljklein 89a0253
rename after merge
michaeljklein 36cdd91
Merge branch 'master' into michaeljklein/stdlib-static-assertions
michaeljklein 3cc4f7d
debug failing tests by updating '<' -> '<=' where needed, cargo clipp…
michaeljklein 9607e6b
Merge branch 'master' into michaeljklein/stdlib-static-assertions
michaeljklein dea58ad
Merge branch 'master' into michaeljklein/stdlib-static-assertions
michaeljklein File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We shouldn't split into safe and unsafe variants but instead have a check that the decomposition is canonical similar to how we do it for byte decompositions.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
a check that the decomposition is canonical
work at compile-time? I would expect to check that it's canonical in Add feature-gated runtime assertions to stdlib functions #6964builtin
function implementations?