Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feat/holder allocation #2286

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Nov 15, 2024
Merged

Conversation

rabbitz
Copy link
Collaborator

@rabbitz rabbitz commented Nov 15, 2024

No description provided.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 15, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 60.04%. Comparing base (f373f6b) to head (2f48b99).
Report is 536 commits behind head on develop.

❗ There is a different number of reports uploaded between BASE (f373f6b) and HEAD (2f48b99). Click for more details.

HEAD has 1 upload less than BASE
Flag BASE (f373f6b) HEAD (2f48b99)
2 1
Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop    #2286      +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage    67.56%   60.04%   -7.52%     
===========================================
  Files          289      354      +65     
  Lines         7944    10108    +2164     
===========================================
+ Hits          5367     6069     +702     
- Misses        2577     4039    +1462     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@rabbitz rabbitz force-pushed the feat/holder_allocation branch from 2f48b99 to 08e8f07 Compare November 15, 2024 06:16
@rabbitz rabbitz added this pull request to the merge queue Nov 15, 2024
Merged via the queue into nervosnetwork:develop with commit 7201ae8 Nov 15, 2024
@rabbitz rabbitz deleted the feat/holder_allocation branch November 15, 2024 06:17
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants