Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[sovereign] Get extended header from storage #6554

Conversation

mariusmihaic
Copy link
Contributor

@mariusmihaic mariusmihaic commented Oct 23, 2024

Reasoning behind the pull request

  • Utility function to get extended header from storage

Proposed changes

Testing procedure

Pre-requisites

Based on the Contributing Guidelines the PR author and the reviewers must check the following requirements are met:

  • was the PR targeted to the correct branch?
  • if this is a larger feature that probably needs more than one PR, is there a feat branch created?
  • if this is a feat branch merging, do all satellite projects have a proper tag inside go.mod?

@mariusmihaic mariusmihaic changed the title CLN: Line [sovereign] Get extended header from storage Oct 23, 2024
@mariusmihaic mariusmihaic self-assigned this Oct 23, 2024
@mariusmihaic mariusmihaic marked this pull request as ready for review October 23, 2024 14:19
sasurobert
sasurobert previously approved these changes Oct 24, 2024
axenteoctavian
axenteoctavian previously approved these changes Oct 28, 2024
Base automatically changed from MX-15948-bootstrap-cross-chain-header to feat/sovereign-mainchain-header-sync October 28, 2024 13:27
@mariusmihaic mariusmihaic dismissed stale reviews from axenteoctavian and sasurobert October 28, 2024 13:27

The base branch was changed.

@mariusmihaic mariusmihaic merged commit aefaae5 into feat/sovereign-mainchain-header-sync Oct 28, 2024
4 checks passed
@mariusmihaic mariusmihaic deleted the MX-15950-get-extended-header-from-storage branch October 28, 2024 14:52
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants