Client-server syncing (à la Web after Tomorrow / Datsync) (WIP) #18
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…sy possibility of changing back. Perf test
…osh.datomic/transact!` finishes
alexandergunnarson
changed the title
…inimal required set of adds/retracts!
|
Just wanted to say I'm very excited to see this PR. Can't wait until it's merged. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
(@metasoarous and I just talked a little on gitter about this)
I'm planning on this PR essentially being Datsync in a nutshell, though it'll likely be missing some functionality (at least in the beginning). Normally I would PR this code to Datsync itself, but according to @metasoarous it's in flux right now. This code might in the future be extracted and placed in Datsync but for now it seems as good a place as any to put it here and let people experiment with it.
The first step is to make a little sync test between Datomic and Clojure DataScript (i.e. ignoring websocket transport for now, but focusing on sync itself) showing that the DataScript DB really only gets the subset of the Datomic DB that it needs, and at that, only the authorized portions of that subset.