[draft] AI generated docs

[bobzhang]

• fix warnings
• info
• AI generated docs
• fmt

[peter-jerry-ye-code-review]

From the provided git diff output for the bool.mbt file, it appears that several functions are being documented with examples and tests. Here are three observations that might be worth addressing:

1. Typo in Comment:
   In the comment for to_uint64, there's a typo in the phrase "Converts a boolean value to an unsigned 64-bit integer." The word "an" should be before "unsigned" for correct grammar. This doesn't affect the functionality but could be confusing for someone reading the documentation.

   -/// Converts a boolean value to an unsigned 64-bit integer. Returns 1 for `true`
   +/// Converts a boolean value to an unsigned 64-bit integer. Returns 1 for `true`

2. Missing Return Type in Examples:
   In the examples provided for to_int, to_int64, to_uint, and to_uint64, the return types are mentioned in the function comments but not explicitly shown in the example outputs. It might be helpful to include the return type in the example outputs for clarity, especially for beginners.

   For example, in to_int:

   inspect!(to_int(true), content="1") // Should indicate that "1" is of type Int

3. Consistency in Example Formatting:
   While the examples are well-formatted, there's a minor inconsistency in how the examples are structured. Some examples have an extra newline before the closing `/// ```` which could be standardized for readability.

   For example, in to_int64:

   test "to_int64" {
     inspect!(to_int64(true), content="1")
     inspect!(to_int64(false), content="0")
   }
   
   test "bool_to_int64_operations" {
     let x = true
     let y = false
     inspect!(to_int64(x) + to_int64(y), content="1")
   }

These suggestions aim to improve the clarity and consistency of the documentation, which can enhance the understanding and usability of the code for other developers.

[coveralls]

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 3870

Details

• 0 of 0 changed or added relevant lines in 0 files are covered.
• 4 unchanged lines in 1 file lost coverage.
• Overall coverage decreased (-0.04%) to 80.026%

---

Files with Coverage Reduction	New Missed Lines	%
unit/unit.mbt	4	0.0%

Totals
Change from base Build 3867:	-0.04%
Covered Lines:	4347
Relevant Lines:	5432

---

💛 - Coveralls