Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[MVP] Match Rosetta SDK Spec #106

Open
3 of 14 tasks
mowkoshka opened this issue Jun 4, 2022 · 0 comments
Open
3 of 14 tasks

[MVP] Match Rosetta SDK Spec #106

mowkoshka opened this issue Jun 4, 2022 · 0 comments
Assignees
Labels
MVP Minimum viable product

Comments

@mowkoshka
Copy link
Contributor

mowkoshka commented Jun 4, 2022

🚀 Feature

Mentat should match the Rosetta SDK spec.

Motivation

The goal is to match the Rosetta SDK spec as Mentat is meant to be an SDK for implementing Rosetta services.
This allows us to be added to the rosetta-ecosystem repository and the ecosystem category of the community site.

Implementation

Some of these may already be done or need to be slightly modified.
All bolded ones are required.
Just going to list them all here for now.

Additionally, each of these should be demonstrated in an examples directory.

@mowkoshka mowkoshka added the Epic An epic containing many features. label Jun 4, 2022
@mowkoshka mowkoshka changed the title [Epic] Match Rosetta SDK Spect [Epic] Match Rosetta SDK Spec Jun 4, 2022
@gluax gluax assigned gluax and unassigned mowkoshka Jul 27, 2022
@gluax gluax mentioned this issue Jul 28, 2022
@gluax gluax assigned 0rphon and unassigned MACS-J1149 Jul 29, 2022
@gluax gluax added this to the Full Rosetta SDK Spec milestone Jan 17, 2023
@Slickbird Slickbird changed the title [Epic] Match Rosetta SDK Spec [MVP] Match Rosetta SDK Spec Jan 17, 2023
@Slickbird Slickbird added MVP Minimum viable product and removed Epic An epic containing many features. labels Jan 17, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
MVP Minimum viable product
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants