You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
AMD GPUs are seeing increased adoption. ROCm has nice compatibility layers with PyTorch, too. Plus, ROCm-SMI (apparently) has all the energy-related management APIs we need -- measuring power and energy, and setting the power limit and GPU frequency.
First, we should evaluate whether the ROCm-SMI APIs behave like their NVML counterparts and show similar time/energy behavior with NVIDIA GPUs.
Then, implementatino-wise, ROCm-SMI lacks a Python package (something like nvidia-smi-py that NVIDIA officially provides). We should probably package that ourselves (much like the pynvml, which is a community-supported Python binding for NVML), until AMD provides an official binding.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
AMD GPUs are seeing increased adoption. ROCm has nice compatibility layers with PyTorch, too. Plus, ROCm-SMI (apparently) has all the energy-related management APIs we need -- measuring power and energy, and setting the power limit and GPU frequency.
First, we should evaluate whether the ROCm-SMI APIs behave like their NVML counterparts and show similar time/energy behavior with NVIDIA GPUs.
Then, implementatino-wise, ROCm-SMI lacks a Python package (something like
nvidia-smi-py
that NVIDIA officially provides). We should probably package that ourselves (much like thepynvml
, which is a community-supported Python binding for NVML), until AMD provides an official binding.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: