Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Simplify cmake config chainloading #4727

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Dec 31, 2024
Merged

Conversation

dg0yt
Copy link
Contributor

@dg0yt dg0yt commented Dec 31, 2024

Description

Removes an ununsed config template.
Adopts the common configuration template pattern of only substituting @VAR@ references, allowing to use a literal ${CMAKE_CURRENT_LIST_DIR} expression for evaluation when the condig is used.

Testing

Covered by find_package(msquic REQUIRED) in src/platform/unittest/external/CMakeLists.txt.

Documentation

No change.

@dg0yt dg0yt requested a review from a team as a code owner December 31, 2024 13:25
@nibanks nibanks enabled auto-merge (squash) December 31, 2024 13:43
@nibanks nibanks added Area: Build external Proposed by non-MSFT labels Dec 31, 2024
@nibanks nibanks merged commit e909d8a into microsoft:main Dec 31, 2024
479 checks passed
@dg0yt dg0yt deleted the cmake-export branch December 31, 2024 14:14
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 31, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 86.54%. Comparing base (10f2487) to head (20e73c2).
Report is 3 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #4727      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   87.17%   86.54%   -0.64%     
==========================================
  Files          56       56              
  Lines       17363    17363              
==========================================
- Hits        15137    15027     -110     
- Misses       2226     2336     +110     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Area: Build external Proposed by non-MSFT
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants