Using full names of generated types to avoid ambiguities with existing namespaces

[peterwurzinger]

Fixes #4475 by using full names ¹ to reference generated types, cc @baywet

Footnotes

1. I'm using the term 'full name' instead of 'fully qualified name' as the FQN would include the assembly name name as well, and it is more consistent with https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/api/system.type.fullname?view=net-8.0 ↩

[peterwurzinger]

@microsoft-github-policy-service agree

[andrueastman]

Thanks for the contribution here @peterwurzinger

Any chance you can also add a changelog entry at the repo root?

It would also be great to create a PR for the samples at https://github.com/microsoft/kiota-samples/tree/main/msgraph-mail/dotnet so that the change can be paired with this PR.

[peterwurzinger]

Sure, yeah. I added a line to the changelog file to reflect the changes made. Also I covered the things you mentioned during the review, feel free to check again.

The only thing left is the PR for the samples. Did you mean using my local Kiota version including this fix to recreate the API client in https://github.com/microsoft/kiota-samples/tree/main/msgraph-mail/dotnet ? Because if that's the case, it would include new code from main, as it seems that sample hasn't been updated in a while. So if that's your intention, would that be what you asked for? If yes, I can surely submit is as a PR.

[andrueastman]

So if that's your intention, would that be what you asked for? If yes, I can surely submit is as a PR.

Yes. Please submit that as a PR as well.

[andrueastman]

Validated PR with https://dev.azure.com/microsoftgraph/Graph%20Developer%20Experiences/_build/results?buildId=151761&view=results for beta/v1.0 graph metadata as well for dotnet and CLI builds