WIP: evebox agent support #32
Open
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
mwindower
reviewed
Jun 20, 2020
… and evebox-server for kind deployments
mwindower
reviewed
Jul 13, 2020
| vars: | ||
| # more specific is better for alert accuracy and performance | ||
| address-groups: | ||
| HOME_NET: "[192.168.0.0/16,10.0.0.0/8,172.16.0.0/12]" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
could this be filled with internal prefixes + trusted networks?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This another example of how we spread configurations between metal-networker and firewall-controller. This file is written by metal-networker, so actually no possibility to access these variables.
This file is only a example deployment for local development in kind. We need to think about a easier solution here.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
compiles but untested, changes to gepm not implemented yet, wait for review comments on this implementation before starting gepm pr.