-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 10
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add capability for electrostatics from ML charges #15
Open
max-veit
wants to merge
24
commits into
mcaroba:master
Choose a base branch
from
max-veit:electrostatics
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Still need to figure out how the local-property gradients work WARNING PROTOTYPE - HERE BE DRAGONS. Compile at your own risk!
I think??? also tried to do it only for atomic charges, since it really doesn't make sense there, while keeping the existing behaviour for vdW parameters (volume) and electron binding energies NOTE this was really tricky to merge with the new local property stuff in turbogap, so ended up changing the way the zero-truncation flag is stored. Hopefully this will do exactly the same thing as before, but it needs to be checked.
just need to figure out how the indexing works
Now iteration pattern is the same as in the vdW code. Also fixed some signs and stuff; still needs to be tested.
Tests to implement:
|
but ran into problems understanding how these local properties are supposed to work in multi-species systems (with a different SOAP/GAP for each center)
This applies the fix from 4ebe04 while adapting it to the current electrostatics implementation
...that were missed in the previous commit Compiles but crashing on an out-of-bounds access on the charge gradients array. Need to find out what's going on here...
one of the clauses was failing on keywords shorter than 9 characters (!)
Still need to check the correctness of gradients
this will make it easier to implement e.g. DSF
(the bug was in the direct electrostatics routine, uncovered during refactoring. Any previous results computed using this electrostatics implementation are wrong.)
Get mc fix from upstream
this one-liner should hopefully fix those crashes presumably due to uninitialized indices...
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Builds off the existing framework for local property prediction, and adds on real-space electrostatics using the DSF/Wolf summation for proper convergence.
Rebased from an older branch so some testing is necessary