Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Adding Power support(ppc64le) with ci and testing to the project for architecture independent #511

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: develop
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

asellappen
Copy link

I am working for IBM to port cpu arch ppc64le for open sources.

This PR adds CI support for the IBM Power Little Endian (ppc64le) architecture. The idea is to ensure that the builds on this architecture are continuously tested along with the Intel builds (amd64) as this is part of the ubuntu distro
on that architecture as well and detecting (and fixing) any issues or failures early would help to ensure that we are always up to date.

This helps us simplify testing later when distributions are re-building and re-releasing,We typically build applications for customers and ISVs, and while we don't use this package directly, we do count on all of the packages in debian/ubuntu to build other packages. So we more likely have this as a second or third level dependency and couldn't tell you explicitly which features we use or our usage model.

Please help to verify and merge.

@vstoykov
Copy link
Collaborator

Hello @asellappen Thank you for your contribution.

Currently there is some problem with the Travis and I'm looking for migrating the project for using Github Actions. Do you know if they support ppc64le in order to make it test on that architecture?

@vstoykov
Copy link
Collaborator

Hey @asellappen. We already migrated to use GitHub Actions. Probbaly new PR need to be made in order to test for that architecture.

You can change your PR to introduce the change in GitHub Actions to test for ppc64le.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants