Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
raise warning if geometry is out of bounds #270
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
raise warning if geometry is out of bounds #270
Changes from all commits
1e08d25
f1178e3
53adbcf
9efef59
d3614c8
7c96925
c35f4e9
27b5e77
1045c99
bb9648e
904cd29
66f5e54
a9337a5
9d50746
62847fc
e977fc9
505b0b4
018c57e
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Docstring needs updating
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is checking the cardinal axes enough? Or you do need to do
(point**2).sum()
vs3*radius**2
?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
See previous comment about radius
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Not sure about this one. It seems more efficient to return a molecule instead of a copy of a molecule but then it really depends on wether you want to change the molecule attributes or not. Any ideas on a sensible default, perhaps have a argument like
copy_molecule=False
?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hmmn, I'm hesitant to add extra arguments to this method. Where is this (indirectly) called?
I would err on the side of function over speed. Wrong results are worse than slow results imo.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Do you want to test
len(records)
?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is not thorough enough: modify copy_mol (or mol) and assert the other is not affected