Development: Migrate FAQ feature to new client guidelines
#9902
Conversation
github-actions
bot
added
the
client
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request involve refactoring the dependency injection methods in the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
src/main/webapp/app/faq/faq.routes.ts (2)
Line range hint
1-8: Consider organizing imports by categoryWhile the imports are functional, they could be better organized following Angular's style guide:
- Angular imports
- Third-party imports
- Application imports
Apply this organization:
import { Injectable, inject } from '@angular/core'; import { HttpResponse } from '@angular/common/http'; import { ActivatedRouteSnapshot, Resolve } from '@angular/router'; import { Observable, of } from 'rxjs'; import { filter, map } from 'rxjs/operators'; + import { FaqService } from 'app/faq/faq.service'; import { Faq } from 'app/entities/faq.model';
Line range hint
13-24: Consider enhancing error handling and type safetyWhile the implementation is functional, there are opportunities to improve error handling and type safety:
- Add error handling for failed HTTP requests
- Handle the non-null assertion more gracefully
Consider this implementation:
resolve(route: ActivatedRouteSnapshot): Observable<Faq> { const faqId = route.params['faqId']; const courseId = route.params['courseId']; if (faqId) { return this.faqService.find(courseId, faqId).pipe( filter((response: HttpResponse<Faq>) => response.ok), - map((faq: HttpResponse<Faq>) => faq.body!), + map((faq: HttpResponse<Faq>) => { + if (!faq.body) { + throw new Error('FAQ not found'); + } + return faq.body; + }), + catchError(() => { + console.error('Error loading FAQ'); + return of(new Faq()); + }), ); } return of(new Faq()); }src/main/webapp/app/faq/faq.service.ts (2)
Line range hint
17-24: Consider enhancing error handling in HTTP operationsWhile the basic error handling through observables is present, consider adding a catchError operator to handle HTTP errors more gracefully and provide better user feedback.
Here's a suggested enhancement:
create(courseId: number, faq: Faq): Observable<EntityResponseType> { const copy = FaqService.convertFaqFromClient(faq); return this.http.post<Faq>(`${this.resourceUrl}/${courseId}/faqs`, copy, { observe: 'response' }).pipe( map((res: EntityResponseType) => { return res; }), + catchError(error => { + console.error('Error creating FAQ:', error); + return throwError(() => new Error('Failed to create FAQ')); + }) ); }
Line range hint
1-150: Consider implementing proper subscription cleanupTo prevent potential memory leaks, consider implementing proper subscription cleanup for components that use this service.
Recommendations:
- Document that consumers should use the async pipe where possible
- For manual subscriptions, use
takeUntilortake(1)operators- Consider adding a note in the service documentation about subscription management
Example usage in components:
export class FaqComponent implements OnDestroy { private destroy$ = new Subject<void>(); ngOnInit() { this.faqService.findAllByCourseId(courseId).pipe( takeUntil(this.destroy$) ).subscribe(faqs => { // handle faqs }); } ngOnDestroy() { this.destroy$.next(); this.destroy$.complete(); } }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
src/main/webapp/app/faq/faq.routes.ts(2 hunks)src/main/webapp/app/faq/faq.service.ts(2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (2)
src/main/webapp/app/faq/faq.routes.ts (1)
src/main/webapp/app/faq/faq.service.ts (1)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
src/main/webapp/app/faq/faq.routes.ts (1)
11-11: LGTM! Successful migration to new DI pattern
The change from constructor injection to the inject() function aligns with the PR objectives and modern Angular practices.
src/main/webapp/app/faq/faq.service.ts (2)
1-1: LGTM: Import statement is correctly updated
The addition of inject to the Angular core imports is properly implemented.
15-15: LGTM: Dependency injection properly migrated to modern pattern
The migration from constructor injection to Angular's inject function is correctly implemented, following the new client guidelines and Angular best practices.
Let's verify the consistency of this migration pattern across related files:
sachmii
temporarily deployed
to
artemis-test3.artemis.cit.tum.de
GitHub Actions
Inactive
HawKhiem
temporarily deployed
to
artemis-test1.artemis.cit.tum.de
GitHub Actions
Inactive
HawKhiem
temporarily deployed
to
artemis-test6.artemis.cit.tum.de
GitHub Actions
Inactive
HawKhiem
temporarily deployed
to
artemis-test3.artemis.cit.tum.de
GitHub Actions
Inactive
ahbitaqu
added
deploy:artemis-test4
and removed
deploy:artemis-test2
deploy:artemis-test4
labels
|
github-actions
bot
added
the
deployment-error
cremertim
removed
the
deployment-error
ahbitaqu
temporarily deployed
to
artemis-test2.artemis.cit.tum.de
GitHub Actions
Inactive
FelixTJDietrich
temporarily deployed
to
artemis-test5.artemis.cit.tum.de
GitHub Actions
Inactive
FelixTJDietrich
added
the
maintainer-approved
bassner
deleted the
chore/communication/faq/migrate-client-to-use-inject
branch
krusche
changed the title
Communication: Migrate FAQ feature to new client guidelinesDevelopment: Migrate FAQ feature to new client guidelines
Checklist
General
Client
Motivation and Context
We want to migrate the communication section to the new client guidelines. In particular, this means that all components should become standalone
Description
This PR adresses the FAQ feature and updates it to the new client guidelines by removing constructor injection
Steps for Testing
Prerequisites:
Testserver States
Note
These badges show the state of the test servers.
Green = Currently available, Red = Currently locked
Click on the badges to get to the test servers.
Review Progress
Code Review
Manual Tests
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Documentation
Refactor
injectfunction.