Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Development: Reduce payload for live synchronization of build overview #9888

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Nov 28, 2024

Conversation

krusche
Copy link
Member

@krusche krusche commented Nov 27, 2024

Checklist

General

Server

  • Important: I implemented the changes with a very good performance and prevented too many (unnecessary) and too complex database calls.
  • I strictly followed the principle of data economy for all database calls.
  • I strictly followed the server coding and design guidelines.
  • I added multiple integration tests (Spring) related to the features (with a high test coverage).
  • I added pre-authorization annotations according to the guidelines and checked the course groups for all new REST Calls (security).
  • I documented the Java code using JavaDoc style.

Client

  • Important: I implemented the changes with a very good performance, prevented too many (unnecessary) REST calls and made sure the UI is responsive, even with large data (e.g. using paging).
  • I strictly followed the principle of data economy for all client-server REST calls.
  • I strictly followed the client coding and design guidelines.
  • Following the theming guidelines, I specified colors only in the theming variable files and checked that the changes look consistent in both the light and the dark theme.
  • I added multiple integration tests (Jest) related to the features (with a high test coverage), while following the test guidelines.
  • I added authorities to all new routes and checked the course groups for displaying navigation elements (links, buttons).
  • I documented the TypeScript code using JSDoc style.
  • I added multiple screenshots/screencasts of my UI changes.
  • I translated all newly inserted strings into English and German.

Changes affecting Programming Exercises

  • High priority: I tested all changes and their related features with all corresponding user types on a test server configured with the integrated lifecycle setup (LocalVC and LocalCI).

Motivation and Context

We want to reduce the payload size for messages related to build overview (localci). Many of the attributes aren't actually needed by the view. so we removed those.

PR also includes a workaround for flickering, so a build job can only be run a max of 5 attempts.

Steps for Testing

PR ALREADY DEPLOYED ON TS3 and STAGING

Prerequisites:

  • 1 Admin
  1. Submit a programming exercise a few times. (count how many times)
  2. Navigate to build overview page
  3. Make sure that the page works as expected (number of processing/queued jobs is correct)
  4. Do the same for Build agents view and build agent details view.

Testserver States

Note

These badges show the state of the test servers.
Green = Currently available, Red = Currently locked
Click on the badges to get to the test servers.







Review Progress

Performance Review

  • I (as a reviewer) confirm that the client changes (in particular related to REST calls and UI responsiveness) are implemented with a very good performance even for very large courses with more than 2000 students.
  • I (as a reviewer) confirm that the server changes (in particular related to database calls) are implemented with a very good performance even for very large courses with more than 2000 students.

Code Review

  • Code Review 1
  • Code Review 2

Manual Tests

  • Test 1
  • Test 2

Performance Tests

  • Test 1
  • Test 2

Summary by CodeRabbit

Release Notes

  • New Features

    • Introduced a new constructor for BuildJobQueueItem to enhance flexibility in updating retry counts.
    • Added public methods to SharedQueueManagementService for retrieving sizes of queued jobs, processing jobs, and build agent information.
  • Improvements

    • Enhanced error handling and logging for rejected build jobs in SharedQueueProcessingService.
    • Streamlined metric extraction methods in MetricsBean for improved performance and clarity.
    • Updated websocket services to filter unnecessary information before transmission.
  • Future Enhancements

    • Comment added to LocalCIWebsocketMessagingService indicating plans to convert build agent information into a proper DTO.

@github-actions github-actions bot added server Pull requests that update Java code. (Added Automatically!) core Pull requests that affect the corresponding module programming Pull requests that affect the corresponding module labels Nov 27, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot added the buildagent Pull requests that affect the corresponding module label Nov 27, 2024
SimonEntholzer
SimonEntholzer previously approved these changes Nov 28, 2024
@BBesrour BBesrour marked this pull request as ready for review November 28, 2024 13:44
@BBesrour BBesrour requested a review from a team as a code owner November 28, 2024 13:44
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 28, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes in this pull request involve updates to several classes related to build job processing and metrics management. A new constructor has been added to the BuildJobQueueItem record for enhanced flexibility. The SharedQueueProcessingService class has improved error handling and logging for build job processing, including a retry mechanism. The MetricsBean class has refactored methods for extracting metrics related to build agents. Additionally, the LocalCIQueueWebsocketService class has been modified to filter unnecessary information from websocket transmissions, while the SharedQueueManagementService class has introduced new methods for retrieving collection sizes.

Changes

File Change Summary
src/main/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/buildagent/dto/BuildJobQueueItem.java Added a new constructor to BuildJobQueueItem for creating instances with a retry count.
src/main/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/buildagent/service/SharedQueueProcessingService.java Enhanced error handling with a retry mechanism for rejected jobs; updated logging and processing logic.
src/main/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/core/config/MetricsBean.java Refactored metric extraction methods to simplify logic and improve accuracy in reporting.
src/main/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/service/localci/LocalCIQueueWebsocketService.java Updated methods to filter unnecessary information from jobs sent over websockets.
src/main/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/service/localci/LocalCIWebsocketMessagingService.java Added a comment for future enhancement regarding build agent information handling.
src/main/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/service/localci/SharedQueueManagementService.java Added three public methods to retrieve sizes of queued jobs, processing jobs, and build agent information.

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

tests, client, feature, bugfix

Suggested reviewers

  • az108
  • florian-glombik
  • JohannesStoehr

Warning

There were issues while running some tools. Please review the errors and either fix the tool’s configuration or disable the tool if it’s a critical failure.

🔧 pmd (7.7.0)
src/main/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/buildagent/service/SharedQueueProcessingService.java

The following rules are missing or misspelled in your ruleset file category/vm/bestpractices.xml: BooleanInstantiation, DontImportJavaLang, DuplicateImports, EmptyFinallyBlock, EmptyIfStmt, EmptyInitializer, EmptyStatementBlock, EmptyStatementNotInLoop, EmptySwitchStatements, EmptySynchronizedBlock, EmptyTryBlock, EmptyWhileStmt, ExcessiveClassLength, ExcessiveMethodLength, ImportFromSamePackage, MissingBreakInSwitch, SimplifyBooleanAssertion. Please check your ruleset configuration.


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 91f158d and 5d21dc3.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/main/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/buildagent/service/SharedQueueProcessingService.java (2 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • src/main/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/buildagent/service/SharedQueueProcessingService.java

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai or @coderabbitai title anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (12)
src/main/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/buildagent/dto/BuildJobQueueItem.java (1)

51-55: Consider documenting shared data structure impact.

Since this is a shared DTO used between core and build agent nodes, the new constructor could affect existing Hazelcast/Redis data structures. Consider adding a Javadoc comment explaining the impact and migration requirements.

Example addition:

+    /**
+     * Constructor used to update retry count for a build job
+     * Note: Changes to this shared data structure may require Hazelcast/Redis migration
+     *
+     * @param queueItem     The existing queue item
+     * @param buildAgent    The build agent that will process the job
+     * @param newRetryCount The updated retry count
+     */
     public BuildJobQueueItem(BuildJobQueueItem queueItem, BuildAgentDTO buildAgent, int newRetryCount) {
src/main/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/service/localci/SharedQueueManagementService.java (3)

119-121: Add method documentation and consider race condition warning

While the method is straightforward, it should include JavaDoc documentation. Also, consider documenting potential race conditions in distributed scenarios where the size might be stale by the time it's used.

+    /**
+     * Returns the current size of the build job queue.
+     * Note: In a distributed environment, the size may change immediately after this call.
+     * @return the number of queued build jobs
+     */
     public int getQueuedJobsSize() {
         return queue.size();
     }

131-133: Add method documentation

Add JavaDoc documentation to maintain consistency with other methods in the class.

+    /**
+     * Returns the current number of jobs being processed across all nodes.
+     * Note: In a distributed environment, the size may change immediately after this call.
+     * @return the number of jobs currently being processed
+     */
     public int getProcessingJobsSize() {
         return processingJobs.size();
     }

Line range hint 119-158: Implementation aligns well with PR objectives

The addition of these size methods supports the PR's goal of reducing payload for live synchronization of build overview. The implementation is clean, consistent, and well-placed within the class structure. The methods provide a more efficient way to access collection sizes without transferring the entire collections.

Consider adding a monitoring aspect to track the effectiveness of this payload reduction, perhaps through metrics that compare the old vs new payload sizes.

src/main/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/buildagent/service/SharedQueueProcessingService.java (4)

269-270: Convert TODO comments to tracked issues.

These TODO comments about centralized logging should be properly tracked for future implementation.

Would you like me to create GitHub issues to track these TODOs for implementing centralized logging?


277-277: Extract magic number to a constant.

The maximum retry count of 5 should be extracted to a constant for better maintainability.

+    private static final int MAX_RETRY_ATTEMPTS = 5;
+
     private void checkAvailabilityAndProcessNextBuild() {
         // ... existing code ...
-        if (buildJob.retryCount() >= 5) {
+        if (buildJob.retryCount() >= MAX_RETRY_ATTEMPTS) {

Also applies to: 278-278


269-270: Consider using structured logging.

The error logging could benefit from structured logging with additional context fields.

-            log.error("Couldn't add build job to thread pool: {}\n Concurrent Build Jobs Count: {} Active tasks in pool: {}, Concurrent Build Jobs Size: {}", buildJob,
-                    localProcessingJobs.get(), localCIBuildExecutorService.getActiveCount(), localCIBuildExecutorService.getMaximumPoolSize(), e);
+            log.error("Failed to add build job to thread pool. buildJob={}, concurrentJobs={}, activeTasks={}, maxPoolSize={}, error={}", 
+                    buildJob, localProcessingJobs.get(), localCIBuildExecutorService.getActiveCount(), 
+                    localCIBuildExecutorService.getMaximumPoolSize(), e.getMessage(), e);

Also applies to: 280-280


283-285: Add more context to the TODO comment.

The TODO comment about running the job on a different build agent needs more context about the implementation strategy.

-                    // TODO: we should try to run this job on a different build agent to avoid getting the same error again
+                    // TODO: Implement build agent selection strategy for retries
+                    // - Track failed build agents in BuildJobQueueItem
+                    // - Implement selection logic to choose a different available agent
+                    // - Consider agent load and failure history in selection
src/main/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/service/localci/LocalCIQueueWebsocketService.java (4)

157-167: Improve object construction with the Builder pattern

The constructors for BuildJobQueueItem, BuildConfig, RepositoryInfo, and BuildAgentInformation involve many parameters, including several empty strings and null values. This can make the code harder to read and maintain due to the risk of misordering parameters. Implementing the Builder pattern for these classes can enhance readability and reduce errors by allowing named parameter assignments.

Also applies to: 175-178, 185-188, 195-203


158-167: Simplify list transformation using Stream API

In the removeUnnecessaryInformation method, you can simplify the loop by utilizing the Stream API to map and collect the filtered jobs. This can make the code more concise and improve readability.

Apply this refactor:

-private static List<BuildJobQueueItem> removeUnnecessaryInformation(List<BuildJobQueueItem> queuedJobs) {
-    var filteredQueuedJobs = new ArrayList<BuildJobQueueItem>(); // make list mutable in case it is not
-    for (BuildJobQueueItem job : queuedJobs) {
-        var buildConfig = removeUnnecessaryInformationFromBuildConfig(job.buildConfig());
-        var repositoryInfo = removeUnnecessaryInformationFromRepositoryInfo(job.repositoryInfo());
-        filteredQueuedJobs.add(new BuildJobQueueItem(job.id(), job.name(), job.buildAgent(), job.participationId(), job.courseId(), job.exerciseId(), job.retryCount(),
-                job.priority(), job.status(), repositoryInfo, job.jobTimingInfo(), buildConfig, null));
-    }
-    return filteredQueuedJobs;
+private static List<BuildJobQueueItem> removeUnnecessaryInformation(List<BuildJobQueueItem> queuedJobs) {
+    return queuedJobs.stream()
+        .map(job -> {
+            var buildConfig = removeUnnecessaryInformationFromBuildConfig(job.buildConfig());
+            var repositoryInfo = removeUnnecessaryInformationFromRepositoryInfo(job.repositoryInfo());
+            return new BuildJobQueueItem(
+                job.id(),
+                job.name(),
+                job.buildAgent(),
+                job.participationId(),
+                job.courseId(),
+                job.exerciseId(),
+                job.retryCount(),
+                job.priority(),
+                job.status(),
+                repositoryInfo,
+                job.jobTimingInfo(),
+                buildConfig,
+                null
+            );
+        })
+        .toList();
 }

175-178: Avoid hardcoding empty strings and nulls

Passing empty strings and null values directly into constructors can lead to confusion and potential errors. Consider the following improvements:

  • Modify the constructors to handle missing or optional fields more gracefully, possibly by using default values.
  • Utilize builder patterns or factory methods to set only the required fields.
  • Use Optional for fields that may or may not be present.

Also applies to: 185-188


74-75: Enhance variable naming for clarity

For better readability, consider renaming the variables after filtering to reflect their state. For example:

  • Rename queuedJobs to filteredQueuedJobs after removing unnecessary information.
  • Rename processingJobs to filteredProcessingJobs similarly.

This makes it clear that these lists have been processed and only contain the necessary information.

Also applies to: 81-82

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 4eaba4e and 91f158d.

📒 Files selected for processing (6)
  • src/main/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/buildagent/dto/BuildJobQueueItem.java (1 hunks)
  • src/main/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/buildagent/service/SharedQueueProcessingService.java (1 hunks)
  • src/main/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/core/config/MetricsBean.java (1 hunks)
  • src/main/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/service/localci/LocalCIQueueWebsocketService.java (4 hunks)
  • src/main/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/service/localci/LocalCIWebsocketMessagingService.java (0 hunks)
  • src/main/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/service/localci/SharedQueueManagementService.java (3 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
  • src/main/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/service/localci/LocalCIWebsocketMessagingService.java
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (5)
src/main/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/buildagent/dto/BuildJobQueueItem.java (1)

Pattern src/main/java/**/*.java: naming:CamelCase; principles:{single_responsibility,small_methods,no_duplication}; db:{perf_queries,datetime_not_timestamp}; rest:{stateless,singleton,delegate_logic,http_only,minimal_dtos}; dtos:{java_records,no_entities,min_data,single_resp}; di:constructor_injection; kiss:simple_code; file_handling:os_indep_paths; practices:{least_access,avoid_transactions,code_reuse,static_member_ref,prefer_primitives}; sql:{param_annotation,uppercase,avoid_subqueries};java:avoid_star_imports

src/main/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/buildagent/service/SharedQueueProcessingService.java (1)

Pattern src/main/java/**/*.java: naming:CamelCase; principles:{single_responsibility,small_methods,no_duplication}; db:{perf_queries,datetime_not_timestamp}; rest:{stateless,singleton,delegate_logic,http_only,minimal_dtos}; dtos:{java_records,no_entities,min_data,single_resp}; di:constructor_injection; kiss:simple_code; file_handling:os_indep_paths; practices:{least_access,avoid_transactions,code_reuse,static_member_ref,prefer_primitives}; sql:{param_annotation,uppercase,avoid_subqueries};java:avoid_star_imports

src/main/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/core/config/MetricsBean.java (1)

Pattern src/main/java/**/*.java: naming:CamelCase; principles:{single_responsibility,small_methods,no_duplication}; db:{perf_queries,datetime_not_timestamp}; rest:{stateless,singleton,delegate_logic,http_only,minimal_dtos}; dtos:{java_records,no_entities,min_data,single_resp}; di:constructor_injection; kiss:simple_code; file_handling:os_indep_paths; practices:{least_access,avoid_transactions,code_reuse,static_member_ref,prefer_primitives}; sql:{param_annotation,uppercase,avoid_subqueries};java:avoid_star_imports

src/main/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/service/localci/LocalCIQueueWebsocketService.java (1)

Pattern src/main/java/**/*.java: naming:CamelCase; principles:{single_responsibility,small_methods,no_duplication}; db:{perf_queries,datetime_not_timestamp}; rest:{stateless,singleton,delegate_logic,http_only,minimal_dtos}; dtos:{java_records,no_entities,min_data,single_resp}; di:constructor_injection; kiss:simple_code; file_handling:os_indep_paths; practices:{least_access,avoid_transactions,code_reuse,static_member_ref,prefer_primitives}; sql:{param_annotation,uppercase,avoid_subqueries};java:avoid_star_imports

src/main/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/service/localci/SharedQueueManagementService.java (1)

Pattern src/main/java/**/*.java: naming:CamelCase; principles:{single_responsibility,small_methods,no_duplication}; db:{perf_queries,datetime_not_timestamp}; rest:{stateless,singleton,delegate_logic,http_only,minimal_dtos}; dtos:{java_records,no_entities,min_data,single_resp}; di:constructor_injection; kiss:simple_code; file_handling:os_indep_paths; practices:{least_access,avoid_transactions,code_reuse,static_member_ref,prefer_primitives}; sql:{param_annotation,uppercase,avoid_subqueries};java:avoid_star_imports

🔇 Additional comments (11)
src/main/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/buildagent/dto/BuildJobQueueItem.java (2)

52-55: LGTM! The new constructor follows established patterns.

The implementation maintains consistency with existing constructors and properly handles the retry count update while preserving immutability.

Let's verify the retry count usage across the codebase:

✅ Verification successful

The retry count implementation is correctly used across the codebase

The new constructor aligns perfectly with the existing retry count usage patterns:

  • The retry count is properly tracked in the BuildJob entity
  • It's consistently used in queue processing with a maximum limit of 5 retries
  • The new constructor is used when re-queueing failed jobs with an incremented retry count
  • All other constructors properly maintain the retry count value through constructor chaining
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check how retry count is used to ensure consistent handling
# Look for retry count field access and modifications
ast-grep --pattern 'retryCount()' 

Length of output: 159


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for retry count usage patterns in Java files
rg -U "retryCount" --type java -A 2 -B 2

Length of output: 10162


52-54: Verify maximum retry count validation.

The constructor accepts any retry count value. Consider adding validation to ensure it doesn't exceed the maximum of 5 attempts mentioned in the PR objectives.

Let's check if validation exists elsewhere:

src/main/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/service/localci/SharedQueueManagementService.java (1)

156-158: Add method documentation and verify metrics integration

Add JavaDoc documentation to maintain consistency. This method appears to be part of the payload reduction effort mentioned in the PR objectives.

+    /**
+     * Returns the current number of registered build agents.
+     * Note: In a distributed environment, the size may change immediately after this call.
+     * @return the number of build agents
+     */
     public int getBuildAgentInformationSize() {
         return buildAgentInformation.size();
     }

Let's verify the integration with metrics collection:

✅ Verification successful

Based on the analysis of the MetricsBean.java file, I can now generate the final response as I have found clear evidence of the integration with metrics collection.

Method is correctly integrated with metrics collection

The getBuildAgentInformationSize() method is properly integrated into the metrics collection system through the extractBuildAgents method in MetricsBean.java, which is used to publish build agent metrics via:

Gauge.builder("artemis.global.localci.agents", localCIBuildJobQueueService, MetricsBean::extractBuildAgents)
    .strongReference(true)
    .description("Number of active build agents")
    .register(meterRegistry);

The suggested JavaDoc documentation is appropriate as it provides important context about the distributed nature of the value.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the usage of the new size methods in metrics collection

# Search for references to these methods in metrics-related classes
rg -l "getQueuedJobsSize|getProcessingJobsSize|getBuildAgentInformationSize" | grep -i "metric"

# Check if these methods are used instead of collection.size() calls
ast-grep --pattern 'collection.size()' | grep -i "metric"

Length of output: 343


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the content of MetricsBean.java and look for any usage of these methods
cat src/main/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/core/config/MetricsBean.java

# Also search for any direct references to SharedQueueManagementService in metrics
rg -l "SharedQueueManagementService" | grep -i "metric"

# Let's also check if there are any other metric-related files that might use these methods
fd metric -t f -e java

Length of output: 38496

src/main/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/core/config/MetricsBean.java (4)

293-293: LGTM! Code simplification improves readability

The change to use a direct method call instead of stream operations simplifies the code while maintaining the same functionality.


297-297: LGTM! Consistent with previous method's simplification

The change maintains consistency with the extractRunningBuilds method's pattern, improving code readability.


301-301: LGTM! Maintains consistent simplification pattern

The change follows the established pattern of simplifying stream operations to direct method calls.


306-307: Verify the impact of excluding paused build agents

The addition of filtering out paused build agents is a significant change that improves metric accuracy. However, we should verify that this change doesn't affect any dependent systems that might rely on the previous behavior.

Let's verify the usage of this metric:

✅ Verification successful

Based on the search results, I can generate the final response as we have sufficient information:

Excluding paused build agents from maxConcurrentBuilds metric is safe

The metric artemis.global.localci.maxConcurrentBuilds is only used as a Micrometer gauge for monitoring purposes, and there are no direct dependencies on this value in the application logic. The PAUSED status is properly handled in the build agent service, indicating this is an expected state in the system's design.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for dependencies on maxConcurrentBuilds metric

# Search for references to the metric name
rg -A 5 "artemis.global.localci.maxConcurrentBuilds"

# Search for potential build agent status checks
rg -A 5 "BuildAgentStatus.PAUSED"

Length of output: 3700

src/main/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/service/localci/LocalCIQueueWebsocketService.java (4)

199-200: Handle null values in BuildAgentInformation appropriately

In the removeUnnecessaryInformationFromBuildAgentInformation method, you're passing null for recentBuildJobs and publicKey. Ensure that the rest of the codebase can handle these null values without issues. If these fields are optional, consider using Optional.empty() or default values to improve robustness.


3-3: Confirm necessity of newly added imports

Please verify that the imports added on lines 3, 24, and 26 are required. Unused imports can clutter the code and should be removed to maintain cleanliness.

Also applies to: 24-24, 26-26


157-203: Consider reducing method visibility to enforce encapsulation

The methods removeUnnecessaryInformation and its related helper methods are declared private static. Ensure that this level of access is appropriate and that these methods are not needed outside this class. Keeping methods as private as possible aligns with the principle of least privilege.


161-163: ⚠️ Potential issue

Add null checks to prevent potential NullPointerExceptions

In methods like removeUnnecessaryInformation, removeUnnecessaryInformationFromBuildConfig, and removeUnnecessaryInformationFromRepositoryInfo, ensure that job.buildConfig(), job.repositoryInfo(), and other accessed properties are not null before invoking methods on them. If these can be null, add appropriate null checks to avoid NullPointerExceptions.

Also applies to: 175-178, 185-188

coderabbitai[bot]
coderabbitai bot previously approved these changes Nov 28, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@coolchock coolchock left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

tested in testing session, works as expected

Copy link
Contributor

@SimonEntholzer SimonEntholzer left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Tested on staging and works. Also used triggerall for ~500 queued jobs

Copy link
Contributor

@cremertim cremertim left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

tested in testing session, works as described

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
buildagent Pull requests that affect the corresponding module core Pull requests that affect the corresponding module programming Pull requests that affect the corresponding module ready for review server Pull requests that update Java code. (Added Automatically!)
Projects
Status: Merged
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants