-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 297
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Communication: Highlight solution answer in thread #10069
Communication: Highlight solution answer in thread #10069
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces a new feature to display a "Solution" badge for posts that resolve a specific issue. This is implemented by adding a new method Changes
Sequence DiagramsequenceDiagram
participant Component as AnswerPostHeaderComponent
participant Posting as Posting Object
participant Template as HTML Template
Component->>Posting: Check resolvesPost property
Component->>Component: isResolvesPostSet()
alt Post Resolves Another Post
Template->>Template: Render Solution Badge
else Post Does Not Resolve
Template->>Template: Hide Solution Badge
end
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Tip CodeRabbit's docstrings feature is now available as part of our Early Access Program! Simply use the command Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
src/main/webapp/app/shared/metis/posting-header/answer-post-header/answer-post-header.component.ts (1)
31-35
: Consider simplifying boolean checks.
While the current logic is correct, you could simplify the return statement by converting the property to a boolean directly, for example:
return !!this.posting.resolvesPost;src/test/javascript/spec/component/shared/metis/postings-header/answer-post-header/answer-post-header.component.spec.ts (1)
96-104
: Add an assertion for displayed text.
The test verifies that the “Solution” span is present, but consider adding an expectation that checks the actual displayed text, ensuring the translation or label is correct.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
src/main/webapp/app/shared/metis/posting-header/answer-post-header/answer-post-header.component.html
(1 hunks)src/main/webapp/app/shared/metis/posting-header/answer-post-header/answer-post-header.component.ts
(1 hunks)src/main/webapp/i18n/de/metis.json
(1 hunks)src/main/webapp/i18n/en/metis.json
(1 hunks)src/test/javascript/spec/component/shared/metis/postings-header/answer-post-header/answer-post-header.component.spec.ts
(2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (4)
src/main/webapp/i18n/de/metis.json (1)
Pattern src/main/webapp/i18n/de/**/*.json
: German language translations should be informal (dutzen) and should never be formal (sietzen). So the user should always be addressed with "du/dein" and never with "sie/ihr".
src/main/webapp/app/shared/metis/posting-header/answer-post-header/answer-post-header.component.html (1)
Pattern src/main/webapp/**/*.html
: @if and @for are new and valid Angular syntax replacing *ngIf and *ngFor. They should always be used over the old style.
src/main/webapp/app/shared/metis/posting-header/answer-post-header/answer-post-header.component.ts (1)
src/test/javascript/spec/component/shared/metis/postings-header/answer-post-header/answer-post-header.component.spec.ts (1)
Pattern src/test/javascript/spec/**/*.ts
: jest: true; mock: NgMocks; bad_practices: avoid_full_module_import; perf_improvements: mock_irrelevant_deps; service_testing: mock_http_for_logic; no_schema: avoid_NO_ERRORS_SCHEMA; expectation_specificity: true; solutions: {boolean: toBeTrue/False, reference: toBe, existence: toBeNull/NotNull, undefined: toBeUndefined, class_obj: toContainEntries/toEqual, spy_calls: {not_called: not.toHaveBeenCalled, once: toHaveBeenCalledOnce, with_value: toHaveBeenCalledWith|toHaveBeenCalledExactlyOnceWith}}
📓 Learnings (1)
src/test/javascript/spec/component/shared/metis/postings-header/answer-post-header/answer-post-header.component.spec.ts (1)
Learnt from: rabeatwork
PR: ls1intum/Artemis#9103
File: src/test/javascript/spec/component/shared/metis/postings-header/answer-post-header/answer-post-header.component.spec.ts:94-94
Timestamp: 2024-11-12T12:52:03.805Z
Learning: The `#today-flag` ID is only present in the test files and not in the actual component's HTML or TypeScript files.
🔇 Additional comments (4)
src/test/javascript/spec/component/shared/metis/postings-header/answer-post-header/answer-post-header.component.spec.ts (1)
25-25
: Import usage is appropriate.
Importing By from @angular/platform-browser is standard practice for DOM queries in tests. No issues here.
src/main/webapp/app/shared/metis/posting-header/answer-post-header/answer-post-header.component.html (1)
41-49
: Conditional rendering and localization look good.
Using the @if syntax conforms to the updated Angular template recommendations, and the localized strings are applied correctly.
src/main/webapp/i18n/en/metis.json (1)
139-139
: Translation key addition is consistent.
The new “resolvesPost” key, “Solution,” aligns well with the rest of the file structure. No issues found.
src/main/webapp/i18n/de/metis.json (1)
139-139
: LGTM! Translation is appropriate and follows guidelines.
The German translation "Lösung" for the solution badge is:
- Concise and clear
- Correctly placed in the
post
section - Uses informal language as required by guidelines
- Aligns with the PR objective to highlight solution answers in threads
Has already been implemented |
Replaces this PR: #9998
Checklist
General
Client
authorities
to all new routes and checked the course groups for displaying navigation elements (links, buttons).Motivation and Context
Implements #9934
Description
Add a solution badge to the resolving message of a thread.
Steps for Testing
Prerequisites:
Testserver States
Note
These badges show the state of the test servers.
Green = Currently available, Red = Currently locked
Click on the badges to get to the test servers.
Review Progress
Performance Review
Code Review
Manual Tests
Exam Mode Test
Performance Tests
Screenshots
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Tests