Feat(codemod): Introduce codemod package

[pavelklibani]

Description

Additional context

Issue reference

---

Before submitting the PR, please make sure you do the following

• Read the Contributing Guidelines.
• Follow the PR Title/Commit Message Convention.
• Provide a description in this PR that addresses what the PR is solving, or reference the issue that it solves (e.g. fixes #123).
• Ideally, include relevant tests that fail without this PR but pass with it.

[netlify]

✅ Deploy Preview for spirit-design-system-demo canceled.

Name	Link
🔨 Latest commit	795675d
🔍 Latest deploy log	https://app.netlify.com/sites/spirit-design-system-demo/deploys/65d47d4a95d29a0008a683dc

[netlify]

✅ Deploy Preview for spirit-design-system-react canceled.

Name	Link
🔨 Latest commit	795675d
🔍 Latest deploy log	https://app.netlify.com/sites/spirit-design-system-react/deploys/65d47d4b81036d0009b610bb

[netlify]

✅ Deploy Preview for spirit-design-system-storybook canceled.

Name	Link
🔨 Latest commit	795675d
🔍 Latest deploy log	https://app.netlify.com/sites/spirit-design-system-storybook/deploys/65d47d4ab20ce200081427a9

[netlify]

✅ Deploy Preview for spirit-design-system-validations canceled.

Name	Link
🔨 Latest commit	795675d
🔍 Latest deploy log	https://app.netlify.com/sites/spirit-design-system-validations/deploys/65d47d4baf36ec00082c22ab

[literat]

A topic for discussion: I would personally prefer naming this package in the plural, e.g. codemods instead of codemod. We have packages like analytics, icons, design-tokens and there will be more than a one codemod in this package. So I think that codemods will suit better. What do you think?

[literat]

Do not forget to set also the scope in .commitlintrc.js in the root of the repository.

[pavelklibani]

@literat

Do not forget to set also the scope in .commitlintrc.js in the root of the repository.

Added, and lint is working now, thank you.

A topic for discussion: I would personally prefer naming this package in the plural, e.g. codemods instead of codemod. We have packages like analytics, icons, design-tokens and there will be more than a one codemod in this package. So
I think that codemods will suit better. What do you think?

Renamed to codemods, i was thinking about the same.

[coveralls]

coverage: 80.9% (-15.5%) from 96.371%
when pulling 795675d on feat/DS-1141-codemod-package
into e954642 on main.

[literat]

It is looking good. Just two minor tweaks and we are good to go.