Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use fuzzy pixel matching in local verification #2738

Open
wants to merge 5 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

cyberj0g
Copy link
Contributor

@cyberj0g cyberj0g commented Jan 27, 2023

What does this pull request do? Explain your changes. (required)

Fix for: #2649

Specific updates (required)
This PR is mostly refactoring and adding some fields to support corresponding LPMS changes: livepeer/lpms#366

How did you test each of these updates (required)
Tests are updated.

Does this pull request close any open issues?
#2649

Edit: originally wrong corresponding LPMS PR was mentioned

@cyberj0g cyberj0g requested a review from thomshutt January 27, 2023 09:39
@cyberj0g
Copy link
Contributor Author

@thomshutt please arrange reviewing this and livepeer/lpms#366 to enable local verification.
Currently, it's too trivial to build an orchestrator, which would bypass doing any work without suspension, while performing DoS on the streams it serves.

@thomshutt
Copy link
Contributor

Hey @cyberj0g, it looks like the build is still failing here

@cyberj0g
Copy link
Contributor Author

cyberj0g commented Mar 3, 2023

@thomshutt it will not work, until lpms PR is merged

@thomshutt
Copy link
Contributor

@cyberj0g Oof, gotcha. Looks like the LPMS build is broken too for that PR, so we'll have to try and figure out what's going on there first

@cyberj0g
Copy link
Contributor Author

cyberj0g commented Mar 3, 2023

@thomshutt I mean this one, not Alex's wrongly mentioned in description: livepeer/lpms#366
It looks good for me.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants