Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add option for running catalyst-api as a stateless service #1336

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jul 23, 2024

Conversation

leszko
Copy link
Contributor

@leszko leszko commented Jul 22, 2024

From now on, we'll be able to run catalyst-api in 3 modes:

  • all: the same as before
  • cluster-only: managed MistUtilLoad and Serf only (intended to use inside Catalyst)
  • api-only: stateless API only (intended to get deployed separately from Catalyst)

Related to the effort of deploying catalyst-api separately from catalyst. Design Doc: https://www.notion.so/livepeer/Zero-Impact-Catalyst-API-Deployments-c2b15232f3a2450ba3e4803130ecd2be?pvs=4#5ce68dfca1c341bfb6b21361d36d19df

@leszko leszko force-pushed the rafal/stateless-catalyst-4 branch from 2447b6e to 6548ec8 Compare July 22, 2024 13:22
@leszko leszko changed the title Add different catalyst-api modes Add option for running catalyst-api as a stateless service Jul 22, 2024
From now on, we'll be able to run catalyst-api in 3 modes:
- all: the same as before
- cluster-only: managed MistUtilLoad and Serf only (intended to use inside Catalyst)
- api-only: stateless API only (intended to get deployed separately from Catalyst)
@leszko leszko force-pushed the rafal/stateless-catalyst-4 branch from 6548ec8 to d4c9d15 Compare July 22, 2024 13:24
@leszko leszko requested a review from thomshutt July 22, 2024 13:25
@leszko leszko marked this pull request as ready for review July 22, 2024 13:25
@leszko leszko merged commit 6f8ea1f into main Jul 23, 2024
11 checks passed
@leszko leszko deleted the rafal/stateless-catalyst-4 branch July 23, 2024 07:35
leszko added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 23, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants