mapic: Fix multistream target URL ? handling
#1300
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Could you add some unit tests to make this easier to reason about please? |
It turns out that Mist has a special parsing of these push URLs which is not a regular URL parsing. It removes anything after the last `?` in the URL and uses that as its config. If there are multiple `?` in the URL (e.g. query-string already existed in target URL), it will strip only (from) the last one and keep the previous. So instead of merging Mist's qs with the existing ones, we actually need to create a separate `?` section for Mist. This guarantees both that Mist gets its config properly, as well as that it preserves the URL to call the target service.
gioelecerati
force-pushed
the
vg/fix/multistream-question-mark
branch
from
776a77f to
803a4fc
Compare
gioelecerati
approved these changes
Sep 4, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
It turns out that Mist has a special parsing of these push URLs which is not a regular URL parsing. It removes anything after the last
?in the URL and uses that as its config. If there are multiple?in the URL (e.g. query-string already existed in target URL), it will strip only (from) the last one and keep the previous.So instead of merging Mist's qs with the existing ones, we actually need to create a separate
?section for Mist. This guarantees both that Mist gets its config properly, as well as that it preserves the URL to call the target service.